Teams

Goy 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesTabitha Elledge / Cari Powell vs Sara Nundkumar / Danielle Broadstreet6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesCari Powell / Kara Ray vs Susan Parsons / Robin Crosier6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDeirdre Hjelt / Katie Bir vs Aimee Largen / Lara Heberle6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesTabitha Elledge / Kara Ray vs Virginia Easley / Melissa Goodman6-0, 6-0
2025-06-24vs East 18 Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PMSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKimberly Franz / Chetana Honnarayanahalli vs Rebekah East / Sarah Schott6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJordan Allison / Katie Bir vs Melanie Burns / Aphton Lang1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKara Ray / Sally Eagleton vs Jennifer Jacobs / Heather Parr6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChetana Honnarayanahalli / Judiann Georgevich vs Leslie Sheppard / Jenny Kemp3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKatherine Beach / Tabitha Elledge vs Morgan Danford / Kim Hunt0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesCari Powell / Sally Eagleton vs Nadia Gregory / Sara Strassell6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesGina Goy / Kimberly Franz vs Morgan Qubein / Cj Isner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJordan Allison / Katie Bir vs Allison Aldridge / Rachel Mohorn6-7, 2-6
2025-05-20vs Williamson 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesCari Powell / Sally Eagleton vs Madison Bowen / Katie Shane6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChetana Honnarayanahalli / Judiann Georgevich vs Karrah Durham / Melissa Gujrati6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeann Spencer / Deirdre Hjelt vs Audrey Snyder / Jeanie Reynolds1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Sally Eagleton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Cari Powell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Katherine Beach
published
3.72
Kara Ray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Tabitha Elledge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Kimberly Franz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Gina Goy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Judiann Georgevich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Katie Bir
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Jordan Allison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Megan Streba
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leann Spencer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Judiann Georgevich5159% games+2.2% vs expected
Kara Ray + Cari Powell314 matchesnot enough data
Cari Powell + Judiann Georgevich314 matchesnot enough data
Gina Goy + Judiann Georgevich314 matchesnot enough data
Cari Powell + Gina Goy123 matchesnot enough data
Gina Goy + Sally Eagleton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sally Eagleton
20W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
4
Cari Powell
34W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Katherine Beach
14W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Tabitha Elledge
172W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Kimberly Franz
41W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
Gina Goy
33W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Judiann Georgevich
35W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Katie Bir
27W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Jordan Allison
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Megan Streba
2W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Leann Spencer
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.