Teams

Howell 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesSara Strassell / Christina Campbell vs Morgan Danford / Marla Barnwell4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Howell / Morgan Qubein vs Andrea Sweat / Jacqueline Herron7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAlexa Smith / Allison Aldridge vs Alexis Ganesh / Amy Bunch4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSarah Howell / Sara Strassell vs Michele Alvarino / Danielle Broadstreet4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesClarissa Tatum / Cj Isner vs Lori Harrington / Cheryl Scott7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlexa Smith / Debbie Shane vs Rebecca Morrison / Lili Harding7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJennifer Mays / Sarah Howell vs Penny Trivette / Susan Parsons7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMorgan Qubein / Meghan de Young vs Robin Crosier / Christa Wykoff6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlexa Smith / Allison Aldridge vs Dana Marpoe / Jamie Cunningham7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesBridget Gislimberti / Jennifer Mays vs Joy Martin / Melissa Goodman6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Howell / Christina Campbell vs Sarah Vess / Bobbie Westrick6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCatherine Martin / Rachel Mohorn vs Kim Edwards / Susan Shughart1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-03vs East 18 Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PMSplit 11
W#2 DoublesClarissa Tatum / Meghan de Young vs Sarah Schott / Sloane McPeak6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAllison Aldridge / Alexa Smith vs Courtney Dagger / Aphton Lang6-7, 3-6
2025-05-28vs Goy 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesNadia Gregory / Sara Strassell vs Cari Powell / Sally Eagleton4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMorgan Qubein / Cj Isner vs Gina Goy / Kimberly Franz3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAllison Aldridge / Rachel Mohorn vs Jordan Allison / Katie Bir7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Bridget Gislimberti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Christina Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Sarah Howell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Sara Strassell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Jennifer Mays
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Morgan Qubein
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Cj Isner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Clarissa Tatum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Meghan de Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Alexa Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Catherine Martin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Allison Aldridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Debbie Shane
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Nadia Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Mohorn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mays + Bridget Gislimberti241159% games+10.1% vs expected
Sara Strassell + Sarah Howell5263% games+5.8% vs expected
Meghan de Young + Clarissa Tatum314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Aldridge + Alexa Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridget Gislimberti
45W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
4.07
4
Christina Campbell
34W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Sarah Howell
32W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Sara Strassell
25W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Jennifer Mays
70W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Morgan Qubein
22W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Cj Isner
21W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Clarissa Tatum
59W–24L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Meghan de Young
43W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3
Alexa Smith
30W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Catherine Martin
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Allison Aldridge
5W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Debbie Shane
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nadia Gregory
13W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Mohorn
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.