Teams

Jacobs 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesChristina Rush / Heather Parr vs Michele Alvarino / Lindsay Olin6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Pollina / Leslie Sheppard vs Lori Harrington / Cheryl Scott5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGail Terrell / Caroline Stowers vs Margo Rossato / Lili Harding6-1, 6-1
2025-07-22vs Williamson 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jacobs / Erin Huffines vs Katie Shane / Layne Saunders3-6, 4-6
2025-07-08vs Dulin 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Lubeck Smith / Jennifer Jacobs vs Catherine Tanner / Penny Trivette4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesReeves Rhoten / Andrea Pollina vs Amy Dulin / Robin Crosier6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnnetta Bartle / Ginger Ballard vs Lara Heberle / Jamie Cunningham5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jacobs / Erin Huffines vs Melissa Goodman / Rhyssa Earley6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs Goy 18+ Tri 4.0/3.5/3.0W Tues PMLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jacobs / Heather Parr vs Kara Ray / Sally Eagleton3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Sheppard / Jenny Kemp vs Chetana Honnarayanahalli / Judiann Georgevich6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jacobs / Kara Jacobs vs Marla Barnwell / Marianna Bryce0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Kemp / Karen Lubeck Smith vs Leslie Marus / Elisabeth Kraska1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Forbes Fields / Ginger Ballard vs Alexis Ganesh / Amy Bunch3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Heather Parr vs Bridget Gislimberti / Jennifer Mays2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Christina Rush
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Heather Parr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Erin Huffines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Karen Lubeck Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Jenny Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Kara Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Reeves Rhoten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Caroline Stowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Ginger Ballard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Pollina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Jane Forbes Fields
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Annetta Bartle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Gail Terrell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Sheppard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Forbes Fields + Ginger Ballard1448% games−13.6% vs expected
Caroline Stowers + Annetta Bartle123 matchesnot enough data
Annetta Bartle + Gail Terrell213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Parr + Christina Rush213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Rush
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
4.25
Heather Parr
39W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Erin Huffines
173W–129L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Karen Lubeck Smith
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Jenny Kemp
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Kara Jacobs
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Reeves Rhoten
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Caroline Stowers
23W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Ginger Ballard
90W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Andrea Pollina
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jane Forbes Fields
28W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Annetta Bartle
15W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Gail Terrell
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Leslie Sheppard
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.