Teams

CV-Palm Springs TC/Hoffman/Ramos

2022 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-21vs CV-Mission Hills CC/L LoberWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Fox / Kathy Rogers vs Laura Susskind / Laurie Lober6-0, 6-1
2022-05-14vs CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Nadine KimLost 01
L#3 DoublesLindy Gaylord / Roberta Stone vs Sara Asatiani / Ann Oswald4-6, 2-6
2022-04-30vs CV-LLW-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Fox / Wanda Ramos vs Tiffany Baker / Melanie Ditton6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Clark / Lindy Gaylord vs Rebecca Brown / Heather Black1-6, 4-6
2022-04-24vs CV-Indian Wells TC/Jo BailinWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatricia Baughman / Kathy Rogers vs Debra Creem / Lori Tanking3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-23vs CV-Indian Wells TC/Jo BailinWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristina Cooley / Lindy Gaylord vs Joann Bailin / Stephania Denton7-6, 6-3
2022-04-16vs CV-Mission Hills CC/L LoberWon 10
W#2 DoublesWanda Ramos / Kathryn Leonard vs Andrea Primer / Karen Meyer7-6, 6-4
2022-04-10vs CV-LLW-Rancho La Quinta/S YoungWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatricia Baughman / Kathy Rogers vs Tiffany Baker / Brenda Ouimet7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Fox / Wanda Ramos vs Lesley Gagnon / Nadine Kim4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tammy Pronenko
published
3.75
Ginny Ehrlich
published 4
3.73
Maureen Jaramillo
published
3.56
Kathy Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Wanda Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Doris Hoffmann
published 3.5
3.24
Christina Cooley
published 3.5
3.12
Lindy Gaylord
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Julie Exley
published
Patricia Baughman
published
Susan Caruso
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Rogers + Wanda Ramos1843% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Rogers + Susan Caruso4446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Pronenko
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Ginny Ehrlich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Maureen Jaramillo
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Kathy Rogers
108W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
Wanda Ramos
74W–60L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Doris Hoffmann
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Christina Cooley
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Lindy Gaylord
68W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Julie Exley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katherine Misskelley
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Baughman
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Caruso
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.