Teams

Kramer/LF

2022 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · WOMEN 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-25vs Kim Lauer/PHLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Prox / Heather Streich vs Tammy McQuaid / Dana Burd7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Woodson / Lisa Kramer vs Marilynda Kuehn / Michelle Dickason4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEllie Eakin / Chere Fergerson vs Angela Yelich / Kim Lauer3-6, 0-6
2022-08-18vs Price/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Streich / Cheryl Willis vs Khawm Cing / Kasey Price6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Woodson / Kim Nix vs Annie Richardson / Whitney Stauffer6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLisa Kramer / Ellie Eakin vs Laura Gavula / Andie Netherland1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-08-08vs Foust/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Prox / Cheryl Willis vs Tracy Earls / Kathy Alexander6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPiper Rinehart / Kim Nix vs Mary Maxey / Jennifer Poole7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLisa Kramer / Chere Fergerson vs Margaret Hosier / Megan Novak6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-04vs Celestain/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Prox / Heather Streich vs Shweta Govind / Petrina Holloway2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKim Nix / Cheryl Willis vs Tamara Sloan / Sarah Haddock7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChere Fergerson / Ellie Eakin vs Carmen Hill / Cassidy Nelson1-6, 2-6
2022-07-28vs Price/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Prox / Heather Streich vs Khawm Cing / Suzanne Laravea6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPiper Rinehart / Elizabeth Woodson vs Kasey Price / Annie Richardson6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEllie Eakin / Christy Stewart vs Jennifer Morales / Emily Hale6-1, 6-3
2022-07-11vs Blue 1: Spencer/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesHeather Streich / Julie Prox vs Allison Wesson / Kristen Schooley6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPiper Rinehart / Elizabeth Woodson vs Amie Berenger / Camille Aman4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristy Stewart / Chere Fergerson vs Heidi Prince / Mandy Pittman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · WOMEN 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green 1: Cook/LF6014410117
2Blue 1: Spencer/LF6013513148
3Colleen Sanders/LF5113510111
4Red 1: Stuart/LF5114416144
5Kimbrough/IS4211715158
6Kim Lauer/PH4211717145
7Utley/LF4212618162
8Westfall/LF4210820160
9Schroedter/TTC339922169
10Falcon/LF339923167
11Kramer/LF3371123173
12Rice/PH3371123171
13Watson/LF249919148
14Park/IS1551327195
15Price/LF1551329199
16Removed players000000
17Foust/LF0651327177
18Hendrix/LF0621633195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Cheryl Willis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Heather Streich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Julie Prox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Elizabeth Woodson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Kim Nix
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Lisa Kramer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Christy Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.04
Chere Fergerson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Piper Rinehart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kramer + Elizabeth Woodson12557% games+13.7% vs expected
Christy Stewart + Lisa Kramer6065% games+6.6% vs expected
Kim Nix + Cheryl Willis6257% games+3.4% vs expected
Heather Streich + Julie Prox232151% games+0.0% vs expected
Heather Streich + Kim Nix303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cheryl Willis
113W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Heather Streich
82W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.95
Julie Prox
81W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Elizabeth Woodson
30W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Kim Nix
90W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
Lisa Kramer
43W–31L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Christy Stewart
49W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Chere Fergerson
7W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Piper Rinehart
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.