Teams

Green 1: Cook/LF

2022 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · WOMEN 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-23vs Falcon/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly KnifeChief / Lori Cook vs Elaine Hammar / Divina Roman6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVicki Sue Loehrs / Michelle Bryan vs Joan Gausvik / Sandra Callahan6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKathi Tabor / Oanh Stanger vs Donna Weatherl / Margaret Kyle6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-08-22vs Park/ISWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly KnifeChief / Lori Cook vs Alisa Gunsch / Linda Peterson6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKay Jones / Taylor Toliver vs Tammy Mattox / Gayle Johnson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHaven Willis / Kathi Tabor vs Debbie Crowley / Nancy Park6-1, 6-4
2022-08-10vs Elmore/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesLori Cook / Laurie Eccles vs Traci Hazel / DAWN Elmore6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Faith / Vicki Sue Loehrs vs Corinne Johnson / Jennifer McPhail6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathi Tabor / Leah Gajan vs Michelle Spurling / Kristin Seifried4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-28vs Rice/PHWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberly KnifeChief / Laurie Eccles vs Stephanie Loseke / Chelsea Richardson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Faith / Michelle Bryan vs Jessica Rice / Jessica Mardis6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHaven Willis / Taylor Toliver vs Kristina Denney / Amy Bradt6-2, 6-2
2022-07-18vs Colleen Sanders/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly KnifeChief / Laurie Eccles vs Jessica Redcorn / Tracie Pelotte6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Bryan / Vicki Sue Loehrs vs Virginia Stroud / Sandy Thompson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHaven Willis / Leah Gajan vs Sthephanie Mab / Michelle Torres5-7, 2-6
2022-07-13vs Watson/LFWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Cook / Laurie Eccles vs Ashley Lamb / Iris Griffin4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Faith / Taylor Toliver vs Michelle Evans / Allison Ashman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKathi Tabor / Leah Gajan vs Julie Chadwick / Crystal Wing6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · WOMEN 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green 1: Cook/LF6014410117
2Blue 1: Spencer/LF6013513148
3Colleen Sanders/LF5113510111
4Red 1: Stuart/LF5114416144
5Kimbrough/IS4211715158
6Kim Lauer/PH4211717145
7Utley/LF4212618162
8Westfall/LF4210820160
9Schroedter/TTC339922169
10Falcon/LF339923167
11Kramer/LF3371123173
12Rice/PH3371123171
13Watson/LF249919148
14Park/IS1551327195
15Price/LF1551329199
16Removed players000000
17Foust/LF0651327177
18Hendrix/LF0621633195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Taylor Toliver
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Vicki Sue Loehrs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Kimberly KnifeChief
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Haven Willis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Laurie Eccles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Kay Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Oanh Stanger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Lisa Faith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Leah Gajan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Kathi Tabor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Cook
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Bryan + Vicki Sue Loehrs7068% games+16.1% vs expected
Vicki Sue Loehrs + Haven Willis7365% games+10.9% vs expected
Oanh Stanger + Taylor Toliver6168% games+7.9% vs expected
Lisa Faith + Michelle Bryan3255% games+6.8% vs expected
Laurie Eccles + Lori Cook4453% games+4.4% vs expected
Kimberly KnifeChief + Lori Cook61051% games+2.5% vs expected
Kimberly KnifeChief + Kay Jones151851% games+1.8% vs expected
Lisa Faith + Kay Jones6653% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Toliver
85W–50L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Vicki Sue Loehrs
95W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Kimberly KnifeChief
116W–118L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Haven Willis
206W–111L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.02
Laurie Eccles
33W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
Kay Jones
135W–129L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Oanh Stanger
61W–41L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Lisa Faith
77W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Leah Gajan
54W–95L career · 3 lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.38
Kathi Tabor
31W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Lori Cook
57W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Bryan
62W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.