Teams

Blue 1: Spencer/LF

2022 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · WOMEN 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-25vs Foust/LFWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarol Conrad / Kristen Schooley vs Ann Stone / Dana Dudley2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCarissa Cooper / Camille Aman vs Shayle Finch / Kathy Alexander6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMandy Pittman / M C vs Meredith Casillas / Mary Maxey6-3, 6-3
2022-08-22vs Kim Lauer/PHWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Conrad / Kristen Schooley vs Dana Burd / Ginger Penn6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesWhitney Jessee / Mary Nesser vs Valerie Cooper / Marilynda Kuehn6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMandy Pittman / M C vs Darla Knight / April Thompson6-3, 6-4
2022-08-15vs Celestain/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Schooley / Amie Berenger vs Kelly Rhodes / Casandra Celestain6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCamille Aman / Whitney Jessee vs Alyssa Chandler / Holly Upthegrove6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMandy Pittman / Heidi Prince vs Cassidy Nelson / Tamara Sloan7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-08vs Price/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristen Schooley / Carol Conrad vs Suzanne Laravea / Tina Moody6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMary Nesser / Amie Berenger vs Annie Richardson / Abby Biggs6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesM C / Mandy Pittman vs Emily Hale / Laura Gavula5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-07-19vs Kim Lauer/PHWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmie Berenger / Allison Wesson vs Faith Bewley / Dana Burd6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Charvat / Camille Aman vs Ginger Coffey / Michelle Dickason3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Prince / Mandy Pittman vs Michelle Daniels / Nicolle Marticello6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-11vs Kramer/LFWon 21
L#1 DoublesAllison Wesson / Kristen Schooley vs Heather Streich / Julie Prox3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmie Berenger / Camille Aman vs Piper Rinehart / Elizabeth Woodson6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Prince / Mandy Pittman vs Christy Stewart / Chere Fergerson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · WOMEN 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green 1: Cook/LF6014410117
2Blue 1: Spencer/LF6013513148
3Colleen Sanders/LF5113510111
4Red 1: Stuart/LF5114416144
5Kimbrough/IS4211715158
6Kim Lauer/PH4211717145
7Utley/LF4212618162
8Westfall/LF4210820160
9Schroedter/TTC339922169
10Falcon/LF339923167
11Kramer/LF3371123173
12Rice/PH3371123171
13Watson/LF249919148
14Park/IS1551327195
15Price/LF1551329199
16Removed players000000
17Foust/LF0651327177
18Hendrix/LF0621633195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Mandy Pittman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Kristen Schooley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Whitney Jessee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Allison Wesson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Camille Aman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Mary Nesser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Carol Conrad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Amie Berenger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Lisa Charvat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Carissa Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.32
Kelly Spencer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amie Berenger + Kristen Schooley9170% games+13.4% vs expected
Carissa Cooper + Lisa Charvat6650% games+1.1% vs expected
Whitney Jessee + Kelly Spencer4250% games−9.2% vs expected
Carissa Cooper + Kelly Spencer2344% gamesnot enough data
Mary Nesser + Kelly Spencer3251% gamesnot enough data
Whitney Jessee + Mary Nesser404 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Jessee + Amie Berenger314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Nesser + Amie Berenger224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mandy Pittman
135W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Kristen Schooley
100W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
Whitney Jessee
76W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Allison Wesson
47W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Camille Aman
48W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Mary Nesser
51W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Carol Conrad
66W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Amie Berenger
90W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
Lisa Charvat
70W–61L career · 1 line in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Carissa Cooper
51W–59L career · 1 line in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Kelly Spencer
44W–82L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.