Teams

Price/LF

2022 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · WOMEN 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-18vs Kramer/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesKhawm Cing / Kasey Price vs Heather Streich / Cheryl Willis1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnie Richardson / Whitney Stauffer vs Elizabeth Woodson / Kim Nix1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Gavula / Andie Netherland vs Lisa Kramer / Ellie Eakin6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-08vs Blue 1: Spencer/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Laravea / Tina Moody vs Kristen Schooley / Carol Conrad4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAnnie Richardson / Abby Biggs vs Mary Nesser / Amie Berenger0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Hale / Laura Gavula vs M C / Mandy Pittman7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-04vs Kim Lauer/PHLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Gavula / Jennifer Morales vs Kim Lauer / Marilynda Kuehn0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndie Netherland / Whitney Stauffer vs April Thompson / Ginger Penn0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Laravea / Samantha Dernbach vs Tammy McQuaid / Valerie Cooper4-6, 2-6
2022-07-28vs Kramer/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesKhawm Cing / Suzanne Laravea vs Julie Prox / Heather Streich1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKasey Price / Annie Richardson vs Piper Rinehart / Elizabeth Woodson7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Morales / Emily Hale vs Ellie Eakin / Christy Stewart1-6, 3-6
2022-07-18vs Foust/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Gavula / Andie Netherland vs Tami Foust / Meredith Casillas5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKasey Price / Annie Richardson vs Tammy Dixon / Mary Maxey6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSamantha Dernbach / Suzanne Laravea vs Dana Dudley / Kathy Alexander2-6, 2-6
2022-07-11vs Celestain/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Moody / Annie Richardson vs Petrina Holloway / Shweta Govind4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWhitney Stauffer / Abby Biggs vs Tamara Sloan / Holly Upthegrove1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Hale / Jennifer Morales vs Carmen Hill / Cassidy Nelson1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · WOMEN 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green 1: Cook/LF6014410117
2Blue 1: Spencer/LF6013513148
3Colleen Sanders/LF5113510111
4Red 1: Stuart/LF5114416144
5Kimbrough/IS4211715158
6Kim Lauer/PH4211717145
7Utley/LF4212618162
8Westfall/LF4210820160
9Schroedter/TTC339922169
10Falcon/LF339923167
11Kramer/LF3371123173
12Rice/PH3371123171
13Watson/LF249919148
14Park/IS1551327195
15Price/LF1551329199
16Removed players000000
17Foust/LF0651327177
18Hendrix/LF0621633195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Tina Moody
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Jo Clark
published
Annie Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Emily Hale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Kasey Price
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Whitney Stauffer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Suzanne Laravea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Andie Netherland
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.00
Jennifer Morales
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Abby Biggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Khawm Cing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Gavula
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jo Clark + Tina Moody123 matchesnot enough data
Annie Richardson + Kasey Price213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tina Moody
73W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jo Clark
90W–65L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Annie Richardson
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Emily Hale
56W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.67
Kasey Price
22W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
2.54
Whitney Stauffer
13W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Suzanne Laravea
18W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.33
2.5
Andie Netherland
10W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Morales
8W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Abby Biggs
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Khawm Cing
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Gavula
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.