Teams

Utley/LF

2022 TUL TRI-LEVEL 18 & Over League · WOMEN 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-11vs Westfall/LFLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Gilbert / Adria Sanditen vs Patty Steen / Chaunna Steen4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa James / Hayli Leavitt vs Jodi Smith / Angie Juarez1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Knight / Michelle Clevenger-Quinn vs Holly Bevill / Vanessa Negley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-01vs Schroedter/TTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAllie Utley / Alex Campbell vs Liesl Jones / Megan Zetik6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Gilbert / Adria Sanditen vs Ashleigh Boedeker / Judith Allen3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Redington / Ashley Medley vs Tricia Dailey / Suzanne Wills6-4, 6-4
2022-07-26vs Kimbrough/ISLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllie Utley / Lori Hubbard vs Tambra Conway / Lorna Fuller4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Redington / Hayli Leavitt vs Cheryl Doyle / Stacy Upton3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Hershberger / Chelsea Mitchell vs Candace Chonka / Sheila Cooper6-1, 7-6
2022-07-20vs Press/RH91Won 30
W#1 DoublesLori Hubbard / Allie Utley vs Isabell Estes / Andrea Walker6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa James / Adria Sanditen vs Iqra Masood / Sandy Hightower1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Knight / Michelle Clevenger-Quinn vs Anna Quick / Jessica Ullrich7-5, 6-4
2022-07-13vs Red 1: Stuart/LFWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Gilbert / Alex Campbell vs Barb Drotar / Liza Wenzel6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAshley Medley / Julie Redington vs Susan Hargis / Kara Plaster4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Hershberger / Chelsea Mitchell vs Sharon Guterman / Patricia Mapel6-3, 6-0
2022-07-07vs Hendrix/LFWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Hubbard / Allie Utley vs Casey Chonka / Miranda Moore1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa James / Hayli Leavitt vs Marla Cole / Jamie Sawyer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Clevenger-Quinn / Amy Knight vs Whitney Winslow / Courtney Cullison7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · WOMEN 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Green 1: Cook/LF6014410117
2Blue 1: Spencer/LF6013513148
3Colleen Sanders/LF5113510111
4Red 1: Stuart/LF5114416144
5Kimbrough/IS4211715158
6Kim Lauer/PH4211717145
7Utley/LF4212618162
8Westfall/LF4210820160
9Schroedter/TTC339922169
10Falcon/LF339923167
11Kramer/LF3371123173
12Rice/PH3371123171
13Watson/LF249919148
14Park/IS1551327195
15Price/LF1551329199
16Removed players000000
17Foust/LF0651327177
18Hendrix/LF0621633195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Alex Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Lauren Hershberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Allie Utley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Lori Hubbard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Ashley Medley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Chelsea Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Adria Sanditen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Hayli Leavitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amy Knight
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.33
Michelle Clevenger-Quinn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Redington
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa James
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsea Mitchell + Ashley Medley10265% games+13.8% vs expected
Lori Hubbard + Allie Utley6452% games+7.1% vs expected
Chelsea Mitchell + Lauren Hershberger10955% games+5.5% vs expected
Melissa James + Adria Sanditen6259% games+4.5% vs expected
Adria Sanditen + Lori Hubbard314 matchesnot enough data
Melissa James + Hayli Leavitt213 matchesnot enough data
Amy Knight + Michelle Clevenger-Quinn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alex Campbell
69W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
Lauren Hershberger
60W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Allie Utley
24W–30L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Lori Hubbard
63W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Ashley Medley
46W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Chelsea Mitchell
84W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Adria Sanditen
83W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Hayli Leavitt
91W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Amy Knight
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Clevenger-Quinn
23W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.33
Julie Redington
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa James
34W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Gilbert
63W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.