Teams

JOHNSON 40s 4.5W Mon AM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 4.5 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-05vs Vandeplancke 40s 4.5W Mon AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Dia Roberts vs Deborah Register / Sallye Parker6-0, 7-5
2025-04-28vs Abraham 40s 4.5W Mon AMLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelinda Morton / Cathy Soblesky vs Linda Helms / Blair Barnett1-6, 3-6
2025-03-31vs Vandeplancke 40s 4.5W Mon AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Cari Powell vs Pam McAmis / Kathy Pace6-2, 7-5
2025-03-24vs Abraham 40s 4.5W Mon AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Kim Littrell vs Sara Nundkumar / Angela McGinn4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-10vs Wrisley 40s 4.5W Mon AMLost 01
L#2 DoublesCathy Soblesky / Sheri Romaine vs Heidi Wrisley / Rolinde Cleyman4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Dia Roberts
published 4.5
4.05
Alison Crews
published 4
3.99
Kim Littrell
published
3.97
Aundrea Hendley
published 4.5
3.89
Sheri Romaine
published
3.87
Kissie Stroup
published
3.84
Cari Powell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Cathy Soblesky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Alice Procter
published 4
3.68
Chris Schermerhorn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Melinda Morton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aundrea Hendley + Kissie Stroup6259% gamesnot enough data
Chris Schermerhorn + Cathy Soblesky4155% gamesnot enough data
Dia Roberts + Aundrea Hendley1439% gamesnot enough data
Alison Crews + Cathy Soblesky224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dia Roberts
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
4
Alison Crews
113W–61L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Kim Littrell
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.99
4.5
Aundrea Hendley
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.97
Sheri Romaine
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.89
Kissie Stroup
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.87
4
Cari Powell
34W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Cathy Soblesky
103W–71L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Alice Procter
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Chris Schermerhorn
83W–43L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Melinda Morton
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.