GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Baeza/FB

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

Schedule

Flight standings11 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Alarcon/TW#1	9	1	36	14	36	375
2GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Hoy/EPTC#2	9	1	35	15	38	343
3GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Gutierrez/EPTC#1	8	2	33	17	44	410
4GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC	7	3	35	15	36	382
5GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Ricks/EPTC#5	6	4	29	21	49	399
6GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#4	5	5	29	21	50	398
7GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Baeza/FB	5	5	25	25	53	386
8GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Abbud/CCC#1	3	7	11	39	84	553
9GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Garcia/EPTC#3	2	8	13	37	77	531
10GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Allen/TW#2	1	9	11	39	83	549
11GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cardenas/CCC#2	0	10	17	33	70	482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23

Claire Brandon

usually #2 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5

3.12

Alyssa Hinojos

usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3.5

—

Ellen Hughes

usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Gerla Gallardo

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published —

—

Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Guadalupe Castillo

usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Guadalupe Saenz

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Jassivy Hernandez

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published —

—

Jeanette Tan

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Margaret Baeza

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published —

—

Marisol Ramirez

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published —

—

Nicky Hunt

published —

—

Ramona Beard

usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published —

—

Rossana Roacho

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published —

—

Sarahi Najera

usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 16% · published —

—

Ursula Morawietz

usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published —

—

Yazmin Pineda

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisol Ramirez + Rossana Roacho	3–4	51% games	−2.3% vs expected
Guadalupe Castillo + Ursula Morawietz	14–9	57% games	not enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Guadalupe Castillo	12–6	56% games	not enough data
Yazmin Pineda + Jassivy Hernandez	11–6	58% games	not enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ursula Morawietz	7–3	56% games	not enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ellen Hughes	6–2	61% games	not enough data
Claire Brandon + Ellen Hughes	2–5	48% games	not enough data
Ramona Beard + Guadalupe Castillo	5–2	62% games	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

Claire Brandon

36W–46L career · 23 lines in 2026

5%92%3%

3.23

3.5

Alyssa Hinojos

41W–46L career · 21 lines in 2026

20%80%<1%

3.12

—

Ellen Hughes

74W–86L career · 23 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Gerla Gallardo

96W–62L career · 28 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker

61W–87L career · 30 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Guadalupe Castillo

96W–65L career · 30 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Guadalupe Saenz

71W–59L career · 20 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jassivy Hernandez

55W–42L career · 38 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jeanette Tan

36W–51L career · 10 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Margaret Baeza

23W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Marisol Ramirez

48W–81L career · 2 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Nicky Hunt

3W–2L career · no lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ramona Beard

54W–60L career · 19 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Rossana Roacho

123W–115L career · 35 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sarahi Najera

69W–38L career · 24 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Ursula Morawietz

40W–27L career · 13 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Yazmin Pineda

42W–37L career · 16 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.