Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.70 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings11 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Alarcon/TW#191361436375
2GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Hoy/EPTC#291351538343
3GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Gutierrez/EPTC#182331744410
4GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC73351536382
5GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Ricks/EPTC#564292149399
6GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#455292150398
7GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Baeza/FB55252553386
8GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Abbud/CCC#137113984553
9GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Garcia/EPTC#328133777531
10GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Allen/TW#219113983549
11GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cardenas/CCC#2010173370482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Danielle Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Cindy Karam
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.31
Andrea McMillan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Anna Camille Kerr
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Carmen-Gloria Yamal
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Elsie Villarreal
usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Erika Avila
usually #1 Singles 48%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published
Hayley Kern
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Karen McVay
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Karla di Pascuale
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Kathy Cartwright
usually #3 Doubles 79%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Laura Leslie
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Leslie Zaragoza
usually #2 Singles 27%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Lluvia Bordier
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Mariela Lane
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Shirley Cervantes
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Wendy Bloss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shirley Cervantes + Karla di Pascuale7263% games+9.4% vs expected
Laura Leslie + Wendy Bloss3550% games+4.4% vs expected
Karen McVay + Elsie Villarreal14953% games+2.7% vs expected
Danielle Harrison + Kathy Cartwright261557% games+1.5% vs expected
Karen McVay + Wendy Bloss7452% games−0.5% vs expected
Laura Leslie + Karen McVay5845% games−1.9% vs expected
Karen McVay + Kathy Cartwright5753% games−3.4% vs expected
Karen McVay + Shirley Cervantes7752% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Harrison
48W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Cindy Karam
36W–24L career · 13 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Andrea McMillan
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Anna Camille Kerr
42W–28L career · 18 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Carmen-Gloria Yamal
47W–62L career · 7 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91
Elsie Villarreal
57W–39L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Erika Avila
72W–37L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hayley Kern
30W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen McVay
60W–86L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karla di Pascuale
70W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Cartwright
98W–60L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Leslie
48W–65L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Zaragoza
48W–48L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lluvia Bordier
37W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariela Lane
22W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shirley Cervantes
75W–62L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Bloss
28W–38L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.