Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Ricks/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings11 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Alarcon/TW#191361436375
2GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Hoy/EPTC#291351538343
3GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Gutierrez/EPTC#182331744410
4GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC73351536382
5GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Ricks/EPTC#564292149399
6GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#455292150398
7GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Baeza/FB55252553386
8GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Abbud/CCC#137113984553
9GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Garcia/EPTC#328133777531
10GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Allen/TW#219113983549
11GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cardenas/CCC#2010173370482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Cecilia Trejo
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.92
Ana Gabilondo
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Singles 21% · published 3
2.82
Ada Castro
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.72
Ana Baca
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Dolly Ricks
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Gloria King
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Jessica Fierro
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Kerry Lore
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Rowse
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Lourdes Livingston
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mariel Berdeja
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Monica Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 24%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published
Natalia Castaneda
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Patricia Dalbin
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Paulina Sandoval
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Singles 46% · published
Renee Aguilar
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Sintra Sampath
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Zaira Delgado
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Lore + Sintra Sampath13557% gamesnot enough data
Monica Gonzalez + Renee Aguilar10363% gamesnot enough data
Monica Gonzalez + Ana Baca7556% gamesnot enough data
Ada Castro + Dolly Ricks4645% gamesnot enough data
Kerry Lore + Patricia Dalbin6366% gamesnot enough data
Dolly Ricks + Gloria King5350% gamesnot enough data
Ada Castro + Cecilia Trejo4351% gamesnot enough data
Linda Rowse + Sintra Sampath7069% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cecilia Trejo
34W–28L career · 23 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Ana Gabilondo
28W–28L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Ada Castro
35W–36L career · 24 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Ana Baca
43W–42L career · 23 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.72
Dolly Ricks
60W–73L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gloria King
100W–61L career · 61 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Fierro
12W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kerry Lore
83W–74L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Rowse
41W–17L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lourdes Livingston
45W–70L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariel Berdeja
21W–19L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Gonzalez
55W–41L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Natalia Castaneda
39W–27L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Dalbin
99W–72L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paulina Sandoval
9W–2L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Aguilar
36W–19L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sintra Sampath
74W–34L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zaira Delgado
54W–34L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.