Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Garcia/EPTC#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings11 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Alarcon/TW#191361436375
2GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Hoy/EPTC#291351538343
3GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Gutierrez/EPTC#182331744410
4GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC73351536382
5GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Ricks/EPTC#564292149399
6GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#455292150398
7GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Baeza/FB55252553386
8GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Abbud/CCC#137113984553
9GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Garcia/EPTC#328133777531
10GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Allen/TW#219113983549
11GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cardenas/CCC#2010173370482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Adriana Galindo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Donna Gray
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Edith Hernandez
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Esther Orona
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published
Eufemia Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Gabriela Stoiber
usually #1 Doubles 51%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Irma Portillo
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Jammie Price
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Singles 24% · published
Kati Hunyadi
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Raquel Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roshelly Paliza
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
Sara Blanco
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Vanessa Avelar
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #1 Singles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eufemia Garcia + Jammie Price4350% games+11.7% vs expected
Maria del Carmen Ledezma + Sara Blanco61045% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Sara Blanco0931% gamesnot enough data
Adriana Galindo + Kati Hunyadi2445% gamesnot enough data
Esther Orona + Kati Hunyadi2348% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Kati Hunyadi1433% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Irma Portillo0535% gamesnot enough data
Esther Orona + Jammie Price134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriana Galindo
28W–50L career · 12 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Donna Gray
45W–48L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Edith Hernandez
7W–16L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Esther Orona
123W–106L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data
Eufemia Garcia
81W–125L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gabriela Stoiber
63W–57L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Irma Portillo
21W–40L career · 44 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jammie Price
47W–41L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jaqueline Martinez Mendoza
35W–28L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kati Hunyadi
76W–65L career · 47 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lizeth Alejandra Torres Castaneda
23W–21L career · 23 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
22W–47L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raquel Sanchez
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roshelly Paliza
21W–32L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Blanco
48W–69L career · 40 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vanessa Avelar
9W–18L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.