Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#4

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 3.40 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings11 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Alarcon/TW#191361436375
2GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Hoy/EPTC#291351538343
3GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Gutierrez/EPTC#182331744410
4GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC73351536382
5GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Ricks/EPTC#564292149399
6GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Fernandez/EPTC#455292150398
7GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Baeza/FB55252553386
8GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Abbud/CCC#137113984553
9GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Garcia/EPTC#328133777531
10GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Allen/TW#219113983549
11GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cardenas/CCC#2010173370482

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
BLANCA REYES GAMEZ
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
ALEJANDRA MONROY
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.29
Ana Lucia Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.28
Blanca Olmos
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published 3.5
3.28
Cristal Tirado
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Estela Abelleira
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.25
Ivette Acosta
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.19
Ana Dominguez
usually #3 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
2.90
Concepcion Bueno
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published 3
2.60
Angelica Neve
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Laura Soto
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Monica Medina
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Rocio Avila
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published
Roma Fonseca
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
Sabrina Monroy
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Sandra Castaneda
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Tatiana Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sabrina Monroy + Rocio Avila11459% games+15.9% vs expected
Concepcion Bueno + Blanca Olmos11264% games+0.5% vs expected
Sandra Castaneda + ALEJANDRA MONROY15758% gamesnot enough data
Ana Dominguez + Estela Abelleira12658% gamesnot enough data
Estela Abelleira + Blanca Olmos9858% gamesnot enough data
Ana Dominguez + Blanca Olmos8757% gamesnot enough data
Cristal Tirado + Angelica Neve8649% gamesnot enough data
Roma Fonseca + Sabrina Monroy6458% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
BLANCA REYES GAMEZ
14W–6L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
ALEJANDRA MONROY
44W–23L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Ana Lucia Sanchez
22W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Blanca Olmos
95W–73L career · 44 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cristal Tirado
27W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Estela Abelleira
39W–43L career · 26 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ivette Acosta
22W–28L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ana Dominguez
48W–51L career · 33 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Concepcion Bueno
64W–27L career · 29 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Angelica Neve
30W–32L career · 9 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Laura Soto
38W–28L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
44W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Medina
38W–24L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rocio Avila
58W–30L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Roma Fonseca
54W–32L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sabrina Monroy
43W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Castaneda
56W–46L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tatiana Fernandez
51W–14L career · 34 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.