Teams

Stosich/Zetner

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - POCATELLO · Men 7.0 - 55 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-29vs Grand SlammersWon 21
W#1 DoublesVan Stosich / Steve Carr vs Jonathan Cree / John M Head6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Stosich / Michael Peterson vs Ali Habashi / Ralph Wall3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMorris Hall / Jim Migel vs Bill Fullmer / James DiSanza3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-23vs Grand SlammersLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarc Garitone / Max Taylor vs Ali Habashi / James DiSanza3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCharles Hunter / Morris Hall vs Frank Prickett / Jonathan Cree7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Stosich / Michael Peterson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-23vs KuhnLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Zentner / Scott Robuck vs Kurt Norgard / Thomas Gwinn0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarc Garitone / Max Taylor vs Bruce Palmer / John Bulger1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Stosich / Michael Peterson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-18vs KuhnLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Zentner / Scott Robuck vs Jon Stoner / Richard Wathne4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMarc Garitone / Max Taylor vs Randall Budge / Thomas Gwinn1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVan Stosich / Jim Migel vs Kurt Norgard / John Bulger6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2022-04-12vs Grand SlammersWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Stosich / Daniel Zentner vs Andrew Taylor / David Kleist6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSteve Carr / Van Stosich vs Bill Fullmer / James DiSanza4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMax Taylor / Michael Peterson vs Doug Lindley / Ralph Wall1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-08vs KuhnLost 03
L#1 DoublesJim Migel / Morris Hall vs Jon Stoner / Bruce Palmer1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Stosich / Daniel Zentner vs Brett Carlsen / Kurt Norgard1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarc Garitone / Max Taylor vs Darren Kuhn / John Bulger2-6, 4-6
2022-04-05vs Grand SlammersWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarc Garitone / Max Taylor vs Bill Fullmer / James DiSanza7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMorris Hall / Daniel Zentner vs Frank Prickett / David Kleist6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJim Migel / Steve Carr vs Andrew Taylor / Jonathan Cree6-2, 6-2
2022-03-28vs KuhnLost 12
L#1 DoublesMorris Hall / Jim Migel vs Jon Stoner / Kurt Norgard2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRon Fisher / Charles Hunter vs Thomas Gwinn / Randall Budge1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Stosich / Daniel Zentner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 7.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Stosich/Zetner3591532213
2Grand Slammers2671739269

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Jim Migel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
John Stosich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Morris Hall
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.95
Michael Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Van Stosich
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Max Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Charles Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Daniel Zentner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Marc Garitone
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Ron Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Robuck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Steve Carr
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Carr + John Stosich7162% games+14.0% vs expected
Van Stosich + Morris Hall11852% games−5.6% vs expected
Jim Migel + Morris Hall7447% games−9.6% vs expected
Charles Hunter + Max Taylor4355% gamesnot enough data
Charles Hunter + Michael Peterson5264% gamesnot enough data
Michael Peterson + Morris Hall4356% gamesnot enough data
John Stosich + Daniel Zentner3253% gamesnot enough data
John Stosich + Morris Hall3262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jim Migel
121W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
John Stosich
168W–144L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Morris Hall
155W–135L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.11
3
Michael Peterson
79W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Van Stosich
52W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Max Taylor
62W–128L career · 6 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Charles Hunter
34W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Daniel Zentner
73W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Marc Garitone
15W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ron Fisher
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Scott Robuck
95W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Carr
12W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.