Teams

TOC.Conzola

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-22vs TOC.LiLost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Kempf / Theresa Stone vs Lusia Li / Laurie Knutte0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Chapman-Wilson / Laurie Reiss vs Li G / Emily Yang3-6, 1-6
2026-08-16vs ACP.NorrisLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Peterson / Christin Daniels vs Kristin Cooley / Christine Gladman5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Stone / Camille Conzola vs Lisa Montague / Karli Eller6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Jones / Virginia Lewis vs Wendy Lindberg / Kristi Laan7-5, 6-2
2026-08-09vs ACP.RiderWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristin Daniels / Nicole Peterson vs Lisa Buyaki / Yvette LeGrande1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Johnson / Laurie Reiss vs Rebecca Reynolds / Kimberly Durland6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSandra Chapman-Wilson / Camille Conzola vs Kimberly Hilt / Kimberly Patrey3-6, 2-6
2026-08-02vs TOC.OsmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Phillips / Theresa Stone vs Roni Bonello / Aulia Tandradinata6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Rebecca Jones vs Elissa Coughlin / Christine Hughes6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Johnson / Virginia Lewis vs Amy Hobbs / Erin McAllister4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Osman3081568
2ACP.Norris3072771
3MD.McDarris317511113
4ANP.Davidson31841292
5ACP.Ress316614101
6TOC.Barclay22751194
7PW.Peeples226614110
8ACP.Rider1254880
9TOC.Conzola12361393
10ANP.Alex134817131
11ACP.Nash043920137
12PW.Burkey043921132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Elise Hamilton
published
3.64
Sandra Chapman-Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Theresa Stone
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Christin Daniels
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Lisa Kempf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Camille Conzola
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Virginia Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Lydia Pasteris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Laurie Reiss
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kempf + Laurie Reiss7456% games+5.2% vs expected
Camille Conzola + Lisa Kempf6552% games−5.6% vs expected
Lydia Pasteris + Lisa Kempf6547% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Kempf + Elise Hamilton224 matchesnot enough data
Camille Conzola + Sandra Chapman-Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elise Hamilton
37W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Sandra Chapman-Wilson
90W–127L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Theresa Stone
8W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
4
Christin Daniels
24W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lisa Kempf
365W–300L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
3.5
Camille Conzola
258W–178L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Virginia Lewis
28W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Lydia Pasteris
118W–96L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Laurie Reiss
234W–202L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.