Teams

ACP.Nash

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.59 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-26vs LOCH.KasbergLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Mitchell / Melyssa Kemp vs Adrianne Leinbach / Breah Woolson3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMichele Wilson / Devon Siege vs Liz Kasberg / Rochelle Grieco2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMary McCann / Tamie Nash vs Thaiza Gloer / Kristine Pelt0-6, 0-6
2026-08-21vs PW.PeeplesLost 12
W#1 DoublesAllyson Schneider / Amanda Fish vs Suzanne Fitzpatrick / Jenny Coley3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Moreno / Devon Siege vs Julie Evans / Tonia Laflamme7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLUCY LAV / Caroline Connor vs Ellen Libby / Susan Fekete1-6, 5-7
2026-08-14vs MD.ParkLost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Mitchell / Devon Siege vs Michelle Spangenberg / Rachael Kiker2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Moreno / Allyson Schneider vs Elizabeth Schwartz / Sandra Park6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary McCann / Patrice Dovel vs Maria Button / Christine Reinke2-6, 4-6
2026-08-07vs ANP.DavidsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesTamie Nash / Amanda Fish vs Mary Hannah Vaughan / Ann Tucker4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Moreno / LUCY LAV vs Heidi Stevens / Shannon Allison0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelyssa Kemp / Amy Trail vs Christina Powers / Deb Lanier7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-31vs ACP.RessLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Mitchell / Caroline Connor vs Christine Watson / Maya Ress6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTamie Nash / Michele Wilson vs Laura Weygandt / Anne-Marie Conklin4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Trimyer / Denise Wilson vs Lirong Zhao / Kathleen Murray6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Osman3081568
2ACP.Norris3072771
3MD.McDarris317511113
4ANP.Davidson31841292
5ACP.Ress316614101
6TOC.Barclay22751194
7PW.Peeples226614110
8ACP.Rider1254880
9TOC.Conzola12361393
10ANP.Alex134817131
11ACP.Nash043920137
12PW.Burkey043921132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Amanda Fish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Heidi Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.43
Kelly Trimyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Patrice Dovel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Allyson Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Devon Siege
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
LUCY LAV
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Melyssa Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Tamie Nash
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Amy Trail
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Caroline Connor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Mary McCann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allyson Schneider + Devon Siege9553% games+9.5% vs expected
Tamie Nash + Heidi Moreno6648% games+3.8% vs expected
Tamie Nash + LUCY LAV5262% games+3.8% vs expected
Devon Siege + Melyssa Kemp8752% games+3.2% vs expected
Allyson Schneider + Melyssa Kemp5359% gamesnot enough data
Allyson Schneider + Heidi Moreno3451% gamesnot enough data
Tamie Nash + Devon Siege3250% gamesnot enough data
Patrice Dovel + Heidi Moreno2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Fish
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Heidi Moreno
144W–184L career · 5 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Kelly Trimyer
98W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Patrice Dovel
196W–154L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Allyson Schneider
291W–172L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Devon Siege
257W–179L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
LUCY LAV
231W–188L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Melyssa Kemp
132W–104L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Tamie Nash
70W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Amy Trail
135W–112L career · 1 line in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Caroline Connor
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Mary McCann
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.