Teams

ANP.Davidson

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-28vs PW.PeeplesWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeidi Stevens / Shannon Allison vs Tonia Laflamme / Ellen Libby4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Powers / Gillian Kelleher vs Julie Evans / Michelle Fitzgerald6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStacey Iacono / Lisa Griffin vs Allison Singer / Kearsi Kessler6-3, 7-6
2026-08-21vs MD.ParkLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoy Martin / Shannon Allison vs Emily Starritt / Cait Bauer4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Davidson / Beate Steffen vs Karen Reynders / Merri Metcalf6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTheresa Roach / Lisa Griffin vs Sophea Duke / Casey Hale4-6, 3-6
2026-08-19vs PW.SerwinWon 30
W#1 DoublesTheresa Roach / Lisa Griffin vs Kelly Bendel / Molly Grundner6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStacey Iacono / Ann Tucker vs Dale Martin / Julie Durand7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Hannah Vaughan / Beate Steffen vs Heather Slinkard / Harriet Wilson6-1, 6-2
2026-08-14vs ACP.RessWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Davidson / Ann Tucker vs Jane Limkakeng / Maya Ress4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShannon Allison / Christina Powers vs Kathleen Murray / Laura Weygandt6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Heisler / Deb Lanier vs Valerie Dorrier / Tracy Jones6-4, 6-0
2026-08-07vs ACP.NashWon 21
L#1 DoublesMary Hannah Vaughan / Ann Tucker vs Tamie Nash / Amanda Fish6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeidi Stevens / Shannon Allison vs Heidi Moreno / LUCY LAV6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristina Powers / Deb Lanier vs Melyssa Kemp / Amy Trail5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Osman3081568
2ACP.Norris3072771
3MD.McDarris317511113
4ANP.Davidson31841292
5ACP.Ress316614101
6TOC.Barclay22751194
7PW.Peeples226614110
8ACP.Rider1254880
9TOC.Conzola12361393
10ANP.Alex134817131
11ACP.Nash043920137
12PW.Burkey043921132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Stacey Iacono
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Stacey Heisler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Joy Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Christina Powers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Deb Lanier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.56
Ann Tucker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Mary Hannah Vaughan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Heidi Stevens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Shannon Allison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Theresa Roach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Beate Steffen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Lisa Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Gillian Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Griffin + Deb Lanier7060% games+9.7% vs expected
Shannon Allison + Christina Powers4154% gamesnot enough data
Mary Hannah Vaughan + Christina Powers2340% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Stevens + Joy Martin044 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Stevens + Christina Powers134 matchesnot enough data
Ann Tucker + Stacey Iacono314 matchesnot enough data
Deb Lanier + Gillian Kelleher044 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Stevens + Shannon Allison213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Iacono
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Stacey Heisler
41W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Joy Martin
57W–78L career · 1 line in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Christina Powers
31W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.62
3.5
Deb Lanier
487W–223L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.59
3.5
Ann Tucker
63W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Mary Hannah Vaughan
29W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Heidi Stevens
16W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Shannon Allison
31W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
4
Theresa Roach
91W–82L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Beate Steffen
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Lisa Griffin
21W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Gillian Kelleher
165W–164L career · 1 line in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.