Teams

ACP.Ress

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-28vs MD.ParkLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Watson / Anne-Marie Conklin vs Rachael Kiker / Katherine Henry2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaya Ress / Laura Weygandt vs Elizabeth Schwartz / Casey Hale6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJamie Hahn / Valerie Dorrier vs Brigette Flower / Marcy Points3-6, 1-6
2026-08-21vs PW.BurkeyWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Watkins / Lirong Zhao vs Alicia Fitzpatrick / Meghan Hammes6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Weygandt / Maya Ress vs Meghan Arndts / Andrea Dusina6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Watson / Elaine Estes vs Marylynn Fitzgerald / Jenn Cooper2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-14vs ANP.DavidsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Limkakeng / Maya Ress vs Laura Davidson / Ann Tucker6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Murray / Laura Weygandt vs Shannon Allison / Christina Powers4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesValerie Dorrier / Tracy Jones vs Stacey Heisler / Deb Lanier4-6, 0-6
2026-08-07vs ANP.AlexWon 21
L#1 DoublesJane Limkakeng / RANEE KUMAR vs Emily Jones / Christa Resavy6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Watkins / Lirong Zhao vs Sandy Alex / Sabrina Hsin Hua Lee6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Watson / Elaine Estes vs Lynelle Boorey / Julie Pedraza7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-31vs ACP.NashWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Watson / Maya Ress vs Cheryl Mitchell / Caroline Connor1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Weygandt / Anne-Marie Conklin vs Tamie Nash / Michele Wilson6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLirong Zhao / Kathleen Murray vs Kelly Trimyer / Denise Wilson4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Osman3081568
2ACP.Norris3072771
3MD.McDarris317511113
4ANP.Davidson31841292
5ACP.Ress316614101
6TOC.Barclay22751194
7PW.Peeples226614110
8ACP.Rider1254880
9TOC.Conzola12361393
10ANP.Alex134817131
11ACP.Nash043920137
12PW.Burkey043921132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Laura Weygandt
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.63
Jane Limkakeng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Lirong Zhao
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Maya Ress
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Anne-Marie Conklin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Valerie Dorrier
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Kathleen Murray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Fony Kusumadi
published 3
3.02
RANEE KUMAR
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Jamie Hahn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Elaine Estes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Dorrier + Anne-Marie Conklin8072% games+19.2% vs expected
Valerie Dorrier + Maya Ress8262% games+7.4% vs expected
Maya Ress + Anne-Marie Conklin6264% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laura Weygandt
269W–127L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jane Limkakeng
215W–113L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Lirong Zhao
28W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Maya Ress
123W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Anne-Marie Conklin
73W–81L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Valerie Dorrier
54W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Kathleen Murray
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Fony Kusumadi
22W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
RANEE KUMAR
43W–103L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Jamie Hahn
20W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Elaine Estes
6W–14L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.