Teams

ANP.Alex

2026 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.18 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-28vs PW.SerwinLost 12
W#1 DoublesPriya Desai / Emily Jones vs Elaine Auslander / Kelly Bendel7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandy Alex / Julie Pedraza vs Julie Durand / Cindy Orlandini3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarni Butchkoski / Kristin Baldyga vs Margo Stutesman / Bonnie Delmar2-6, 1-6
2026-08-21vs TOC.BarclayLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Hyde / Jennifer Johnson vs Diane Werner / Amy Barclay1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDanelle Alex / Kace Martin vs Jennifer Holt / Sherry Lockhart5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSabrina Hsin Hua Lee / Malinda Hain vs Amy Kell / Ann Gray2-6, 2-6
2026-08-14vs PW.BurkeyWon 21
L#1 DoublesDanelle Alex / Lynelle Boorey vs Kimberly Hall / Meghan Hammes2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMalinda Hain / Christa Resavy vs Jenn Cooper / Andrea Dusina3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKace Martin / Emily Jones vs Lysa Stylski / Meghan Arndts6-2, 6-4
2026-08-07vs ACP.RessLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily Jones / Christa Resavy vs Jane Limkakeng / RANEE KUMAR7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSandy Alex / Sabrina Hsin Hua Lee vs Lisa Watkins / Lirong Zhao1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLynelle Boorey / Julie Pedraza vs Christine Watson / Elaine Estes7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-31vs MD.McDarrisLost 12
L#1 DoublesDanelle Alex / Cindy Bechtholdt vs Victoria Pomarico / Michelle Oury3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesPriya Desai / Kace Martin vs Kathleen Cullen / Carolyn Lee7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSandy Alex / Lynelle Boorey vs Dori Mcdarris / Brooke Rawls2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · Combo 40 & Over 7.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Osman3081568
2ACP.Norris3072771
3MD.McDarris317511113
4ANP.Davidson31841292
5ACP.Ress316614101
6TOC.Barclay22751194
7PW.Peeples226614110
8ACP.Rider1254880
9TOC.Conzola12361393
10ANP.Alex134817131
11ACP.Nash043920137
12PW.Burkey043921132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Priya Desai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Lynelle Boorey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Danelle Alex
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.22
Marni Butchkoski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Cindy Bechtholdt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Sandy Alex
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Kace Martin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.10
Sara Hyde
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Sabrina Hsin Hua Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Christa Resavy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Malinda Hain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.92
Julie Pedraza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Kristin Baldyga
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Malinda Hain + Danelle Alex7070% games+16.8% vs expected
Priya Desai + Kace Martin6069% games+13.5% vs expected
Kristin Baldyga + Christa Resavy71050% games+10.3% vs expected
Danelle Alex + Kace Martin20364% games+7.7% vs expected
Christa Resavy + Malinda Hain8356% games+1.4% vs expected
Julie Pedraza + Kristin Baldyga1440% games−2.3% vs expected
Malinda Hain + Kace Martin2546% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Baldyga + Sara Hyde3353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Priya Desai
36W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
3.5
Lynelle Boorey
97W–77L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Danelle Alex
104W–57L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.26
Marni Butchkoski
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Cindy Bechtholdt
17W–17L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Sandy Alex
46W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Kace Martin
73W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Sara Hyde
54W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.10
3
Sabrina Hsin Hua Lee
26W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Christa Resavy
72W–45L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Malinda Hain
59W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Julie Pedraza
76W–53L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Kristin Baldyga
45W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.