Teams

Albus

2025 FW Combo Tournament · 8.5 Ladies

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-25vs Needs SetsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKerry Schonwald / Mariajose Alvarez vs Brooke Cabianca / Caryn Angus7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElise Jeffery / Kera Watts vs Brooke Hodnick / Eleonor Belanger6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTeresa Albus / Kimberly Grogan vs Kate VandeBerghe / Heather Vik2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-24vs ApostleWon 30
W#1 DoublesKerry Schonwald / Mariajose Alvarez vs Areli Martinez / Laura Locke6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElise Jeffery / Kera Watts vs Sandy Beasley / Sandi Shipley7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTeresa Albus / Amy Morgan vs Priscilla Schimming / Julie Smith3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-24vs BadenLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeresa Albus / Tara Morgan vs Alyssa Bauer / Katherine Smith2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMariajose Alvarez / Kerry Schonwald vs Ryoko Suzuki / Susan Huber6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Grogan / Elise Jeffery vs Kayleigh Holt / Edith Kruckmann3-6, 1-6
2025-05-23vs FindleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKerry Schonwald / Elise Jeffery vs Aubrey Findley / Melissa McDaniel2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Albus / Tara Morgan vs Katherine Johnston / Alexa Mallard3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Grogan / Amy Morgan vs Ashley Reaves / Andree Kale1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Elise Jeffery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.15
Tara Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
Kerry Schonwald
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.98
Kera Watts
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.87
Kimberly Grogan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Teresa Albus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mariajose Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Albus + Kera Watts6069% games+11.2% vs expected
Elise Jeffery + Kera Watts6255% games+7.6% vs expected
Teresa Albus + Kimberly Grogan31146% games−2.9% vs expected
Mariajose Alvarez + Kerry Schonwald10557% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elise Jeffery
52W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Tara Morgan
29W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
4.15
Kerry Schonwald
43W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
4.10
Kera Watts
53W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Kimberly Grogan
62W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
Teresa Albus
32W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Mariajose Alvarez
37W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.