Teams

Findley

2025 FW Combo Tournament · 8.5 Ladies

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-25vs BadenWon 10
W#2 DoublesVanessa Kelley / Janis Barbash vs Alyssa Bauer / Katherine Smith7-6, 6-3
2025-05-25vs ApostleLost 12
L#1 DoublesCorrine Quast / Andree Kale vs Areli Martinez / Sandi Shipley0-4
L#2 DoublesAshley Reaves / Erin Aldrich vs Tamara Murer / Julie Smith6-2, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAubrey Findley / Alexa Mallard vs Erin Davis / Laura Locke7-5, 7-6
2025-05-24vs Needs SetsWon 10
W#3 DoublesVanessa Kelley / Janis Barbash vs Christina Perron / Jody Hassemer6-3, 7-6
2025-05-23vs AlbusWon 30
W#1 DoublesAubrey Findley / Melissa McDaniel vs Kerry Schonwald / Elise Jeffery6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Johnston / Alexa Mallard vs Teresa Albus / Tara Morgan6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAshley Reaves / Andree Kale vs Kimberly Grogan / Amy Morgan6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Ashley Reaves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Aubrey Findley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.14
Corrine Quast
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Vanessa Kelley
published
4.09
Janis Barbash
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.07
Laura Jacobi
published
3.83
Erin Aldrich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Andree Kale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Alexa Mallard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aubrey Findley + Vanessa Kelley5646% games−10.1% vs expected
Corrine Quast + Laura Jacobi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Reaves
40W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Aubrey Findley
47W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Corrine Quast
17W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
4.14
Vanessa Kelley
26W–17L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
Janis Barbash
43W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.09
Laura Jacobi
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
Erin Aldrich
10W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Andree Kale
21W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Alexa Mallard
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.