← Teams

Old but Not Dead

2025 USTA MIXED 55 & OVER - POCATELLO · MIXED 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.61 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-07vs Idaho/Hall/55&Over7.0XWon 1–0
W#3 DoublesAngie Anderson / Eric Anderson vs Colby Adams / Lisa Wheeler6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2025-11-07vs Idaho/Hall/55&Over7.0XWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesAngie Anderson / Eric Anderson vs Nyla Kress / Morris Hall7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Angie Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.51
Jacqualyn Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Deborah Stosich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Teresa Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Gibby Lee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Joe Andersen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Jim Migel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
John Stosich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
—
Jinny Boozer
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqualyn Nelson + Gibby Lee4–461% games+4.7% vs expected
Deborah Stosich + John Stosich3–448% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Nelson + Joe Andersen1–23 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Anderson
74W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
3.5
Jacqualyn Nelson
214W–199L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Deborah Stosich
78W–81L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Teresa Henderson
127W–103L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Gibby Lee
107W–62L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Joe Andersen
234W–250L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Jim Migel
121W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
John Stosich
168W–144L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lisa Nelson
73W–131L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
—
Jinny Boozer
63W–44L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.