Teams

Dagger 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.5 Women Fall Singles

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-20vs Keaney 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesRosa Phillips vs Emily Mack2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRebekah East vs Alexa Smith2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesSandy Cathers vs Cackie Marsh6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEmily Wilson vs Rosemarie Palazzolo6-7, 1-6
2025-09-29vs Keaney 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMLost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Wilson vs Emily Mack2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRosa Phillips vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesSandy Cathers vs Kari Eddington1-6, 1-6
2025-09-08vs Keaney 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMWon 21
L#1 SinglesRebekah East vs Emily Mack2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSandy Cathers vs Allison Aldridge0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAshlyn Wilson vs Cackie Marsh6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRebekah East vs Kari Eddington2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRosa Phillips vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesAshlyn Wilson vs Jennifer Angelada6-2, 6-0
2025-08-11vs Keaney 3.5W Fall Singles Mon PMLost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Wilson vs Alexa Smith2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesRosa Phillips vs Rosemarie Palazzolo7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCourtney Dagger vs Suki Gutierrez3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesSandy Cathers vs Kari Eddington3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Rosa Phillips
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.26
Ashlyn Wilson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Emily Wilson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.02
Danielle Laliberte
published 3.5
2.99
Sandy Cathers
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.99
Rebekah East
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Dagger + Ashlyn Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosa Phillips
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Ashlyn Wilson
20W–15L career · type D · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Emily Wilson
178W–123L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Danielle Laliberte
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Sandy Cathers
25W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Rebekah East
26W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.