Teams

C 5.5W MV Ventre

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings19 teams · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 5.5W TP Laux000000
2C 5.5W PW Merugu000000
3C 5.5W PW Reusser000000
4C 5.5W TRR Gegorski000000
5C 5.5W GR MacLane-Hodges000000
6C 5.5W MV Tomallo000000
7C 5.5W MV Ventre000000
8C 5.5W CC Lammers000000
9C 5.5W HF Iams000000
10C 5.5W BR Wernow000000
11C 5.5W CV Poe000000
12C 5.5W BA Johnson000000
13C 5.5W MM Bode000000
14C 5.5W TRR Lammers000000
15C 5.5W CL Gobrogge000000
16C 5.5W SH Sherer000000
17C 5.5W CRC King000000
18C 5.5W PM Quist000000
19C 5.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Yuping Wu
published
2.90
Sara Carracher
published
2.64
2.58
Kristin Blaser
published
2.58
Valerie Kuykendall
published
2.57
Nina Greenberg
published
2.55
Noor Almudallal
published
2.54
Neeti Sundaresh
published
2.52
Sara Nine
published
2.51
Kate Lawson
published
2.46
Barb Schoen
published 2.5
2.41
Giovanna Ventre
published 2.5
2.32
Ritu Makkar
published
2.31
Morgan Willoughby
published
2.13
Susan Richlak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Carracher + Neeti Sundaresh3447% games+4.0% vs expected
Susan Richlak + Ritu Makkar2447% games−5.3% vs expected
Susan Richlak + Barb Schoen4159% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Kuykendall + Morgan Willoughby404 matchesnot enough data
Giovanna Ventre + Ritu Makkar224 matchesnot enough data
Ritu Makkar + Barb Schoen044 matchesnot enough data
Susan Richlak + Morgan Willoughby033 matchesnot enough data
Noor Almudallal + Kristin Blaser123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yuping Wu
45W–31L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sara Carracher
45W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Emily Fitzpatrick
16W–9L career · no lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
Kristin Blaser
23W–29L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
Valerie Kuykendall
37W–27L career · no lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Nina Greenberg
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Noor Almudallal
20W–15L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
Neeti Sundaresh
23W–25L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
Sara Nine
36W–29L career · no lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.52
Kate Lawson
1W–17L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Barb Schoen
23W–26L career · no lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.46
2.5
Giovanna Ventre
48W–52L career · no lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
Ritu Makkar
28W–50L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.32
Morgan Willoughby
11W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
Susan Richlak
13W–27L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.