Teams

C 5.5W MM Bode

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings19 teams · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 5.5W TP Laux000000
2C 5.5W PW Merugu000000
3C 5.5W PW Reusser000000
4C 5.5W TRR Gegorski000000
5C 5.5W GR MacLane-Hodges000000
6C 5.5W MV Tomallo000000
7C 5.5W MV Ventre000000
8C 5.5W CC Lammers000000
9C 5.5W HF Iams000000
10C 5.5W BR Wernow000000
11C 5.5W CV Poe000000
12C 5.5W BA Johnson000000
13C 5.5W MM Bode000000
14C 5.5W TRR Lammers000000
15C 5.5W CL Gobrogge000000
16C 5.5W SH Sherer000000
17C 5.5W CRC King000000
18C 5.5W PM Quist000000
19C 5.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Milagro Mendez
published
2.61
Reese Van Keuren
published
2.57
Kathleen Reardon
published
2.48
Natalie Winer
published
2.46
Sanita Kazazic
published
2.43
Julia Han
published
2.38
Lisa Smilnak
published
2.38
2.21
Maria Chelou Hsia
published
2.20
Debra Bode
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Bode + Sanita Kazazic6650% games−1.2% vs expected
Julia Han + Sanita Kazazic2841% games−10.2% vs expected
Julia Han + Maria Chelou Hsia2540% gamesnot enough data
Sanita Kazazic + Lisa Smilnak5256% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Smilnak + Kathleen Reardon5260% gamesnot enough data
Debra Bode + Natalie Winer044 matchesnot enough data
Sanita Kazazic + Maria Chelou Hsia134 matchesnot enough data
Maria Chelou Hsia + Lisa Smilnak404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Milagro Mendez
17W–8L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Reese Van Keuren
19W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%22%78%
2.61
Kathleen Reardon
12W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
Natalie Winer
18W–39L career · no lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
Sanita Kazazic
68W–98L career · no lines in 2026
0%61%39%
2.46
Julia Han
39W–71L career · no lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Lisa Smilnak
34W–23L career · no lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Christina Pochemsaniy
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Maria Chelou Hsia
23W–40L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Debra Bode
35W–111L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.