Teams

C 5.5W TP Laux

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women

19 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings19 teams · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 5.5W TP Laux000000
2C 5.5W PW Merugu000000
3C 5.5W PW Reusser000000
4C 5.5W TRR Gegorski000000
5C 5.5W GR MacLane-Hodges000000
6C 5.5W MV Tomallo000000
7C 5.5W MV Ventre000000
8C 5.5W CC Lammers000000
9C 5.5W HF Iams000000
10C 5.5W BR Wernow000000
11C 5.5W CV Poe000000
12C 5.5W BA Johnson000000
13C 5.5W MM Bode000000
14C 5.5W TRR Lammers000000
15C 5.5W CL Gobrogge000000
16C 5.5W SH Sherer000000
17C 5.5W CRC King000000
18C 5.5W PM Quist000000
19C 5.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Sarah Cashman
published
2.83
Rebecca Voris
published
2.82
Melissa Willett
published
2.81
Colleen Tate
published 3
2.76
Kim Dean
published
2.67
Casey Houdek
published 3
2.55
Anne Laux
published 3
2.48
Allyson Stewart
published 3
2.39
Amy Rauh
published 2.5
2.37
Tiffanie Brown
published
2.37
Theresa Leffler
published
2.33
Chelsea Derrig
published 2.5
2.22
Diane Kilivris
published 2.5
2.09
Allison Landes
published 2.5
1.98
Laura Dhavale
published
Julie Albrecht
published
Stacie Switzer
published
Susan Reese
published
Tricia Graham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Dean + Tricia Graham4454% games+7.3% vs expected
Anne Laux + Casey Houdek4167% games+6.1% vs expected
Diane Kilivris + Theresa Leffler2541% games−1.1% vs expected
Tricia Graham + Theresa Leffler0529% games−11.3% vs expected
Melissa Willett + Tiffanie Brown2347% gamesnot enough data
Diane Kilivris + Tiffanie Brown2342% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Leffler + Tiffanie Brown2348% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Leffler + Allison Landes2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Cashman
71W–120L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Rebecca Voris
51W–34L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Melissa Willett
103W–83L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Colleen Tate
45W–36L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
Kim Dean
85W–97L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Casey Houdek
37W–33L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Anne Laux
45W–52L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
3
Allyson Stewart
16W–37L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Amy Rauh
20W–20L career · no lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Tiffanie Brown
48W–70L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
Theresa Leffler
46W–74L career · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Chelsea Derrig
20W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Diane Kilivris
23W–57L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Allison Landes
15W–24L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Laura Dhavale
14W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Julie Albrecht
14W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacie Switzer
25W–38L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Reese
3W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tricia Graham
43W–59L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.