Teams

C 5.5W CV Poe

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings19 teams · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 5.5W TP Laux000000
2C 5.5W PW Merugu000000
3C 5.5W PW Reusser000000
4C 5.5W TRR Gegorski000000
5C 5.5W GR MacLane-Hodges000000
6C 5.5W MV Tomallo000000
7C 5.5W MV Ventre000000
8C 5.5W CC Lammers000000
9C 5.5W HF Iams000000
10C 5.5W BR Wernow000000
11C 5.5W CV Poe000000
12C 5.5W BA Johnson000000
13C 5.5W MM Bode000000
14C 5.5W TRR Lammers000000
15C 5.5W CL Gobrogge000000
16C 5.5W SH Sherer000000
17C 5.5W CRC King000000
18C 5.5W PM Quist000000
19C 5.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Betsey Poe
published 3
2.52
Celeste Asmar
published 3
2.49
Suzanne Herbener
published
2.47
Krista Ensign
published
2.40
Lori Kaminski
published
2.38
Heidi Carmigiano
published
2.38
Debora Bork
published 3
2.34
Beverly Chambers
published 3
2.19
Carol Pribble
published 2.5
2.19
Janice Schwartz
published
2.19
Elizabeth Nickel
published
2.06
Robin Kleinman
published
1.94
Anne Halper
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Carmigiano + Celeste Asmar1633% games−8.9% vs expected
Anne Halper + Beverly Chambers5650% games−11.4% vs expected
Debora Bork + Suzanne Herbener1432% gamesnot enough data
Debora Bork + Betsey Poe1444% gamesnot enough data
Celeste Asmar + Betsey Poe0536% gamesnot enough data
Anne Halper + Robin Kleinman134 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Herbener + Betsey Poe224 matchesnot enough data
Krista Ensign + Betsey Poe224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Betsey Poe
41W–72L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Celeste Asmar
36W–68L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Suzanne Herbener
12W–29L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Krista Ensign
39W–63L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
Lori Kaminski
22W–29L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.40
Heidi Carmigiano
19W–63L career · no lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38
3
Debora Bork
76W–100L career · no lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38
3
Beverly Chambers
23W–23L career · no lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.34
2.5
Carol Pribble
2W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Janice Schwartz
4W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Elizabeth Nickel
17W–23L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Robin Kleinman
26W–73L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Anne Halper
24W–50L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.