Teams

C 5.5W CC Lammers

2026 NEOTA Combo · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.81 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings19 teams · NEOTA 5.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 5.5W TP Laux000000
2C 5.5W PW Merugu000000
3C 5.5W PW Reusser000000
4C 5.5W TRR Gegorski000000
5C 5.5W GR MacLane-Hodges000000
6C 5.5W MV Tomallo000000
7C 5.5W MV Ventre000000
8C 5.5W CC Lammers000000
9C 5.5W HF Iams000000
10C 5.5W BR Wernow000000
11C 5.5W CV Poe000000
12C 5.5W BA Johnson000000
13C 5.5W MM Bode000000
14C 5.5W TRR Lammers000000
15C 5.5W CL Gobrogge000000
16C 5.5W SH Sherer000000
17C 5.5W CRC King000000
18C 5.5W PM Quist000000
19C 5.5W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Alamelu Arakoni
published 3
2.98
Tisha Bell
published
2.87
2.66
Ann Cleminson
published 3
2.60
Iuliana Grosescu
published 3
2.55
Sandi Best
published
2.51
Shawnee Domonkos
published
2.37
Bonnie Thiel
published 3
2.23
Elizabeth Singh
published 2.5
2.19
Linda Richardson
published
2.13
Debra Speicher
published 2.5
1.94
Anita Lammers
published 2.5
Karen Mitchell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawnee Domonkos + Karen Mitchell6358% games+7.9% vs expected
Tisha Bell + Ann Cleminson7356% games+3.5% vs expected
Linda Richardson + Debra Speicher2642% games+3.4% vs expected
Alamelu Arakoni + Tisha Bell1643% games−7.0% vs expected
Bonnie Thiel + Debra Speicher3444% gamesnot enough data
Alamelu Arakoni + Iuliana Grosescu4260% gamesnot enough data
Iuliana Grosescu + Debra Speicher2445% gamesnot enough data
Iuliana Grosescu + Ann Cleminson2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alamelu Arakoni
134W–84L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Tisha Bell
108W–92L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Dilki Kandanarachchi
43W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Ann Cleminson
39W–32L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Iuliana Grosescu
52W–47L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.60
Sandi Best
14W–19L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
Shawnee Domonkos
23W–49L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
3
Bonnie Thiel
12W–22L career · no lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.37
2.5
Elizabeth Singh
6W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Linda Richardson
14W–27L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Debra Speicher
16W–49L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Anita Lammers
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Karen Mitchell
22W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.