Teams

CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $25

1Summer Combo Mix WN · WE

21 players · average NTRP 3.73 / CHICAGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesJean Soh / Rod Ganesan vs Hilario Salgado / Ayano Nakamura6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHaina Shin / Tony Ling vs Marialin Lomongo / Thomas Kim1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Burns / John Xia vs Claudia Ma / Emmanuel Antonio3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Louie Gonzalez vs Elleson Song / Howard Wu3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Lund / Mike Stringer vs Michelle Yeh / Manik Dewan6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Blankenbaker / Tony Ling vs Haiying Yuan / Lucas Majewski6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-09Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Munteanu / Tony Ling vs Misha Tseytlin / Jingyuan Sun6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSarah Blankenbaker / John Xia vs Dennis Tysl / Sydney Zusman3-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJoel McVey / Emily Lund vs Ally Bachmann / GREGORY JONES6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Terry / John Xia vs Steve Blaha / Cari Anderson7-6, 6-2
2026-07-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Munteanu / Louie Gonzalez vs Kristin Lamb / Akash Chaporkar6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesEmily Lund / Joel McVey vs Grace Rider / Ricardo Jimenez7-5, 5-4
W#3 DoublesMargaux Teegarden-Downs / Mike Stringer vs Sheila Spade / Chuck Zitnick7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Baltazar / Mike Stringer vs Hazem Isawi / Jane Ford1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S ComboX7.5 5.RT Spinazze Sat 7 $277117714151
2CDTA S ComboX7.5 9.Gnbk Tysl Sun 5 $307220719202
3CDTA S ComboX7.5 8.McFet Baltazar Sun 3 $255212920189
4CDTA S ComboX7.5 3.CPW Yang Sat 6 $285315921179
5CDTA S ComboX7.5 1.MTC Brown Sat 7 $33.544121226200
6CDTA S ComboX7.5 4.Wilm Wright Fri 7 $2234111025203
7CDTA S ComboX7.5 6.HF Parks Tue 7 $2235131124179
8CDTA S ComboX7.5 2.Diver (OUT) Spade Sun 3 $163672043283
9CDTA S ComboX7.5 10.RT Burks Thu 7 $272772044290
10CDTA S ComboX7.5 7.STP Hayashida Sun 3 $251661532209

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Christine Munteanu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Haina Shin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Jean Soh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
David Shin
published 4
3.69
Sarah Blankenbaker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Joel McVey
published 3.5
3.56
Ketong Xie
published
3.47
3.44
Emily Lund
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
3.35
Rod Ganesan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Tony Ling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Louie Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kedar Bhat
published 3.5
3.11
Jiakung Feng
published
3.06
Sam Jemielity
published 3.5
Elizabeth Burns
published
John Xia
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mike Stringer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sara Morris
published
Sarah Terry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marjorie Baltazar + Rod Ganesan8365% games−1.1% vs expected
Sarah Blankenbaker + Sam Jemielity5651% games−1.4% vs expected
Mike Stringer + Sara Morris3647% gamesnot enough data
Louie Gonzalez + Christine Munteanu6256% gamesnot enough data
Jean Soh + Louie Gonzalez2547% gamesnot enough data
Rod Ganesan + Emily Lund3357% gamesnot enough data
Christine Munteanu + Tony Ling2447% gamesnot enough data
Margaux Teegarden-Downs + Tony Ling4264% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Munteanu
89W–95L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Haina Shin
200W–104L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Jean Soh
455W–271L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
David Shin
21W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Sarah Blankenbaker
173W–172L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Joel McVey
111W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.60
Ketong Xie
38W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
4
Marjorie Baltazar
180W–84L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Emily Lund
241W–111L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
3.5
Margaux Teegarden-Downs
58W–36L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Rod Ganesan
134W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Tony Ling
16W–19L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Louie Gonzalez
90W–70L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Kedar Bhat
118W–128L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Jiakung Feng
2W–12L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Sam Jemielity
14W–22L career · type S · no lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.06
Elizabeth Burns
28W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
John Xia
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mike Stringer
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Morris
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Terry
14W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.