Teams

ALL AMERICAN TENNIS CLUB

2024 TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER LEAGUE 3.5 · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesKayla Blum / Annie Wang vs Julie Tontapanish / Lucy Twohy1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Ballard / Suzette LaGrange-Miranda vs Jacqueline Prestileo / Nicole Lefebvre3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMari Valvo / Melania Butko vs Emily Geurts / Anne Martz0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSuzette LaGrange-Miranda / Christi Lin vs Nyree Hartman Saad / Jacqueline Prestileo6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Candy Rosenberg
published 4
3.92
Annie Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Kayla Blum
published 4
3.88
Josephine McPeak
published 4
3.68
ALVA BRANDON
published 4
3.64
Nicole Reyes
published
3.62
Gretchen Moy
published 4
3.42
Christi Lin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Christine Ballard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Mari Valvo
published 3.5
Melania Butko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annie Wang + Christi Lin4346% games+8.9% vs expected
Gretchen Moy + Kayla Blum15463% games+8.2% vs expected
Candy Rosenberg + Kayla Blum20264% games+6.8% vs expected
Christi Lin + Suzette LaGrange-Miranda3354% games+4.7% vs expected
Mari Valvo + ALVA BRANDON343151% games+4.5% vs expected
Candy Rosenberg + Josephine McPeak8261% games+2.7% vs expected
Gretchen Moy + Josephine McPeak584554% games+2.4% vs expected
Gretchen Moy + Candy Rosenberg261160% games−0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Suzette LaGrange-Miranda
191W–83L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Candy Rosenberg
256W–104L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
4.02
4.5
Annie Wang
64W–31L career · 1 line in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.92
4
Kayla Blum
230W–131L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Josephine McPeak
239W–178L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
ALVA BRANDON
158W–125L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Nicole Reyes
99W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.64
4
Gretchen Moy
267W–154L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Christi Lin
193W–120L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Christine Ballard
140W–99L career · 1 line in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Mari Valvo
181W–212L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
3.02
Melania Butko
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.