Teams

Serves You Right

2026 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-29vs OverServed18+Won 10
W#2 DoublesWendy Anderson / Kaley Kosak vs Beth Lassen / Chureena Looney6-1, 7-6
2026-06-17vs Love AllWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Tribble / Kaley Kosak vs Chelsey Melby / Jennifer Mitchell6-4, 6-2
2026-06-10vs Slice Girls 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrette Shakespeare / Kaley Kosak vs Judy Baier / Jennifer Sukow4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-08vs Net ResultsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Tribble / Kaley Kosak vs Emily Flores / Tara Wolf6-2, 6-2
2026-06-01vs Shot Show 18sWon 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Tribble / Kaley Kosak vs Sondra Power-Thornton / Karri Jones6-1, 6-1
2026-05-20vs OverServed18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Tribble / Kaley Kosak vs Mary Lynne Schilling / Jenny Grunke6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Ashley Tribble
published 4
3.72
Amy Steckel
published 4
3.70
3.66
Suzanne Baran
published 4
3.65
Lisa Hulsman
published 4
3.56
Kaly Gillette
published 4
3.53
Janelle Carr
published 4
3.52
Katie Scanlan
published 4
3.25
Terri Wippel
published 3.5
3.14
Cindy Biedebach
published 3.5
Kaley Kosak
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Steckel + Suzanne Baran7258% games+1.1% vs expected
Amy Steckel + Brette Shakespeare4357% games−0.5% vs expected
Lisa Hulsman + Ashley Tribble4255% games−10.3% vs expected
Ashley Tribble + Kaley Kosak12072% gamesnot enough data
Janelle Carr + Brette Shakespeare0537% gamesnot enough data
Amy Steckel + Kaley Kosak404 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Tribble + Brette Shakespeare123 matchesnot enough data
Brette Shakespeare + Cindy Biedebach213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ashley Tribble
182W–147L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Amy Steckel
116W–122L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Brette Shakespeare
77W–72L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Suzanne Baran
212W–163L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Lisa Hulsman
68W–50L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Kaly Gillette
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Janelle Carr
38W–58L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Katie Scanlan
58W–100L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Terri Wippel
147W–129L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cindy Biedebach
54W–66L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Kaley Kosak
42W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.