Teams

Racketeers

2024 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 4.12 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-09-19vs Backhanded ComplimentsLost 01
L#2 DoublesGina Sharp / Bill Sharp vs Mila Wood / Samuel Andrus4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-17vs Get Your Shot TogetherSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Rebecca Newby / Matt Rezendes2-5
L#3 DoublesRobert Clifford / Maryann Moorhead vs Spencer Woods / Anya Sandusky3-6, 2-6
2024-09-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Clifford / Robert Clifford vs Brent Bradburn / Kelly Wedeven7-5, 6-3
2024-09-10vs UntouchaballsWon 20
W#1 DoublesRilee Moorhead / Bill Sharp vs Landon Reese / Karen East6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Clifford / Maryann Moorhead vs Denise Schwendener / Ben Meibergen6-4, 6-4
2024-09-05vs Strung Out 8.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Clifford / Dawna Buckingham vs Kelley Canning / Taylor Morris3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Mark Phillips vs Justin Endow / Dana Gross3-6, 4-6
2024-08-29vs PTSA 8.5Split 11
W#2 DoublesGina Sharp / Bill Sharp vs Hanna Jacobs / Robert Miranda7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Mark Phillips vs Kristen Jacobs / Cardale Herzog4-6, 2-6
2024-08-27vs Backhanded ComplimentsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKimberly Clifford / Chad Vincent vs Samuel Andrus / Madison Wright5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRussell Moorhead / Gina Sharp vs Andrew Kim / Kellee Bates3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-20vs Brace YourselvesWon 20
W#2 DoublesRobert Clifford / Shelley Vincent vs Spencer Angstman / Emily Smith6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Brent Bradburn / Jo Roby6-4, 6-2
2024-08-15vs UntouchaballsWon 10
W#3 DoublesBill Sharp / Gina Sharp vs Debbie Merritt / Ben Meibergen6-1, 7-5
2024-08-15vs Get Your Shot TogetherLost 01
L#3 DoublesMark Phillips / Michelle Phillips vs Mark Malmstrom / Bobette Wood0-6, 1-6
2024-08-13vs Strung Out 8.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesShelley Vincent / Chad Vincent vs Justin Endow / Dana Gross3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Clifford / Robert Clifford vs Erin Peterson / Mike O'Toole2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Get Your Shot Together12030614205
2PTSA 8.593241229285
3Strung Out 8.548152145358
4Racketeers48142247372
5Brace Yourselves11153163402

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Rilee Moorhead
published 4.5
4.37
Rachel Moorhead
published 4.5
Gina Sharp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.21
Mike Kirby
published 4.5
4.11
Mike Buckingham
published 4
3.81
Chad Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Bill Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Dawna Buckingham
published 4
3.63
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
3.59
3.37
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
Jeff Buckingham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mark Phillips
published
Michelle Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Clifford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Shelley Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Buckingham + Maryann Moorhead81047% games+7.4% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Rilee Moorhead2747% games+1.2% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Russell Moorhead14952% games−2.9% vs expected
Russell Moorhead + Rachel Moorhead81050% games−3.2% vs expected
Mike Buckingham + Rilee Moorhead5945% games−3.7% vs expected
Patricia Gastanaga + Mike Kirby3351% games−9.9% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Jeff Buckingham282253% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Clifford + Robert Clifford261650% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Rilee Moorhead
74W–34L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
4.53
4.5
Rachel Moorhead
49W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
4.37
4.5
Gina Sharp
79W–63L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Mike Kirby
241W–106L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
4
Mike Buckingham
137W–88L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
4.11
4
Chad Vincent
49W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Bill Sharp
53W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Patricia Gastanaga
71W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dawna Buckingham
94W–65L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Maryann Moorhead
149W–107L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Kimberly Clifford
142W–113L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Russell Moorhead
110W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Jeff Buckingham
50W–61L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Phillips
12W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Phillips
42W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Clifford
85W–84L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelley Vincent
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.