Teams

TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart/Lucchesi

2026 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-07-26vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Matera / Diane Essary vs Audra Edele / Elizabeth Cochrane0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Nelida Reyes-Matos vs AMY MCCORMACK / Lisa Frisbie5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Dziubina / Janice Lucchesi vs Pauline Hudson / Jacqueline Mulhall6-7, 4-4
W#1 DoublesMary Matera / Misao Naito vs Claire Hurley / Dara Lieberson0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Mary Lou Ramery vs Maja Sholler / Jamie Katz6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargaret Mehai / Nelida Reyes-Matos vs Hiam Asmar / Nancy Bento4-6, 4-6
2026-07-12vs CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCallLost 03
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Twombly / Misao Naito vs Beth Nechamkin / Alissa Wilson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Essary / Mary Lou Ramery vs Sharon Hawkins / Kathryn Pizzuto4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSusan Tibbetts / Margaret Mehai vs Deborah Barnwell / Cecilia McCall1-6, 0-6
2026-06-28vs CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/RotheLost 03
L#1 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Dale Norton vs Lesley Kalenson / KENDLE ARCIDIACONO3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMisao Naito / Susan Tibbetts vs Lori Leckliter / Shelby Smith0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Louw / Diana Jackson vs Dina Weinstein / Karen Moriarty0-6, 2-6
2026-06-20vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenWon 21
W#1 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Susan Tibbetts vs Terry Nolan / Antonina Korepina2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDale Norton / Lois Hanley vs Maggie Nava / Janice Lareau3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMargaret Mehai / Priscilla Twombly vs Bobbi Deangelis / Dika Nussberg6-2, 7-5
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Twombly / Diana Louw vs Marlena Simmons / Felicia DeSanto6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Lucchesi / Dale Norton vs Christine Moore / Yvonne Iversen0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Tibbetts / Diana Jackson vs Ellen Leigh / Jacqueline Bohan1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDiane Essary / Janice Lucchesi vs Susanne Sparks / Joan Hiam1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMisao Naito / Priscilla Twombly vs Brooke Jaeger / Janice Cavatoni4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Mehai / Nelida Reyes-Matos vs Karen Strating / Heidi Locke Simon0-6, 1-6
2026-05-03vs MRC:Retro Slammers:Hawley/IslamLost 03
L#1 DoublesLois Hanley / Janice Lucchesi vs Tina Rivera / Betsy Demeyer3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Dale Norton vs Tammy MacAdams / Silvia Islam5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNelida Reyes-Matos / Diana Jackson vs Lisa Moore / Dana Manning0-6, 1-6
2026-04-25vs KH:Point Taken:ClarkeLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Matera / Priscilla Twombly vs Karen Bray / Michelle Dvorkin6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanice Lucchesi / Lois Hanley vs Helene Neigler / Marjan Verhelst4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Jackson / Cheryl Dziubina vs Alicia Cintron / Jesse Glionna2-6, 5-7
2026-03-29vs 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/GiffLost 12
L#1 DoublesMisao Naito / Priscilla Twombly vs Kelly Lash / Penny Schmitt2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Susan Tibbetts vs Lynn Enquist / Jane Lucas2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCheryl Dziubina / Dale Norton vs Valerie D'Alexander / Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/BlackLost 03
L#1 DoublesLoretta Bohnen / Diane Essary vs Maureen Goodrich / Deborah Montenegro0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Lucchesi / Priscilla Twombly vs Kate Piironen / Susan Dellenbaugh6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Dziubina / Margaret Mehai vs Suzanne Black / Celia Ponvert2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/Rothe01125716208
2CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating01122821234
3CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCall01120825267
4CP:Brace Yourselves SENIORitas:Catto/Swanson01119926258
54S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff011171430264
6KH:Point Taken:Clarke011151433296
7GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/Black011131640316
8WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Hamelin/Eliseenkova011132044311
9MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven011121944329
10MRC:Ageless Aces:Dowd01172553360
11TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart/Lucchesi01162757364

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Mary Matera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Diane Essary
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Priscilla Twombly
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.12
Misao Naito
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Mary Lou Ramery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Dale Norton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.92
Loretta Bohnen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.91
Diana Louw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Cheryl Dziubina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.68
Margaret Mehai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Diana Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Nelida Reyes-Matos
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Janice Lucchesi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lois Hanley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Norma Zwart
published
Susan Tibbetts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Misao Naito + Priscilla Twombly101246% games−3.3% vs expected
Margaret Mehai + Dale Norton3647% games−3.3% vs expected
Diana Louw + Priscilla Twombly4644% games−3.5% vs expected
Mary Lou Ramery + Loretta Bohnen61449% games−4.2% vs expected
Margaret Mehai + Priscilla Twombly2642% games−6.4% vs expected
Norma Zwart + Priscilla Twombly8950% games−9.6% vs expected
Loretta Bohnen + Priscilla Twombly5850% games−11.8% vs expected
Margaret Mehai + Nelida Reyes-Matos11135% games−12.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Matera
29W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Diane Essary
16W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Priscilla Twombly
61W–84L career · 7 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Misao Naito
36W–61L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.12
Mary Lou Ramery
12W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Dale Norton
49W–101L career · 5 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Loretta Bohnen
47W–75L career · 7 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Diana Louw
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3.5
Cheryl Dziubina
16W–34L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
Margaret Mehai
47W–85L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Diana Jackson
12W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.65
Nelida Reyes-Matos
31W–86L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Janice Lucchesi
45W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lois Hanley
24W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Norma Zwart
30W–58L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Tibbetts
18W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.