Teams

4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff

2026 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Rose / Penny Schmitt vs Deanna Santoro / Sarah Liddle2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRuth van Den Nieuwenhuizen / Leslie Moss vs Kathy Blenk / Eileen Troise3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCarven Albanese / Patricia Rinaldi vs Jennifer Corrado / Louise Hagstrom7-6, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJanel Downs / Sally Bednar vs Kristen Hoft / Janice Cavatoni6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Rose / Penny Schmitt vs Laura Buckley / Erika Jaeger4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Meany / Patricia Rinaldi vs Karen Strating / Brooke Jaeger1-6, 1-6
2026-06-28vs GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/BlackWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanel Downs / Kelly Lash vs Kate Piironen / Jill Boffa6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJane Lucas / Sally Bednar vs Wendy Chicosky / Jennifer Wood5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEliza Brown / Patricia Rinaldi vs Deborah Montenegro / Jennifer Young4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-14vs CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCallLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanel Downs / Kelly Lash vs Alissa Wilson / Leslie Lombino4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Meany / Patricia Rinaldi vs Evelyn Hagenow / Christine Pon6-7, 4-3
L#3 DoublesLynn Broder / Catherine Giff vs Kathryn Pizzuto / Karen Greenblatt4-6, 6-6
2026-05-30vs KH:Point Taken:ClarkeLost 12
L#1 DoublesSally Bednar / Jill Vollmer vs Carla Carroll / Nancy Huang6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Enquist / Nancy Meany vs Cindy Lannon / Angela Jameson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPatricia Rinaldi / Catherine Giff vs Susan Decker / Myrna Gardner1-6, 0-6
2026-04-26vs CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/RotheWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Enquist / Janel Downs vs Nicole Berman / Lori Leckliter6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesPenny Schmitt / Eva Ortiz vs Madelyn Jolliffe / Daniela Sansone6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEliza Brown / Jill Vollmer vs Amy Lerner / Fran Torres4-6, 5-7
2026-04-19vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Rose / Lynn Enquist vs AMY MCCORMACK / Melodie McVerry7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeslie Moss / Jill Vollmer vs Deidra Picciano / Jeanine Powers3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Broder / Catherine Giff vs Jodi Wasserstein / Kathleen Dowd7-6, 4-4
2026-04-12vs MRC:Retro Slammers:Hawley/IslamWon 30
W#1 DoublesSally Bednar / Janel Downs vs Shannon Craley / Ana Murray6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEliza Brown / Kelly Lash vs Laurie Walls / Karen Hanley6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Moss / Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen vs Jackie Donnelly / Jennifer StephenTorpey6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesKelly Lash / Penny Schmitt vs Misao Naito / Priscilla Twombly6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Enquist / Jane Lucas vs Loretta Bohnen / Susan Tibbetts6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesValerie D'Alexander / Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen vs Cheryl Dziubina / Dale Norton4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-22vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanel Downs / Elizabeth Rose vs Susan Haven / Jeanne Consiglio7-6, 3-4
W#2 DoublesEva Ortiz / Sally Bednar vs Julie Bastarache / Tanyia Pino7-6, 2-2
W#3 DoublesJane Lucas / Eliza Brown vs Terry Nolan / CHRISTINE CHARLES6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesPenny Schmitt / Kelly Lash vs Claire Hurley / Maja Sholler6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesValerie D'Alexander / Jane Lucas vs Ellyn Ulfsson / Marcia Hamelin4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/Rothe01125716208
2CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating01122821234
3CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCall01120825267
4CP:Brace Yourselves SENIORitas:Catto/Swanson01119926258
54S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff011171430264
6KH:Point Taken:Clarke011151433296
7GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/Black011131640316
8WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Hamelin/Eliseenkova011132044311
9MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven011121944329
10MRC:Ageless Aces:Dowd01172553360
11TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart/Lucchesi01162757364

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Janel Downs
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.38
Kelly Lash
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.37
Eva Ortiz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Penny Schmitt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Sally Bednar
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Eliza Brown
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Lynn Enquist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Carven Albanese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Jane Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Leslie Moss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Nancy Meany
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Patricia Rinaldi
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.00
Lynn Broder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Catherine Giff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elizabeth Rose
published
Jill Vollmer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie D'Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Meany + Leslie Moss4648% games+11.9% vs expected
Eva Ortiz + Sally Bednar15362% games+10.6% vs expected
Lynn Broder + Catherine Giff5354% games+8.8% vs expected
Lynn Enquist + Janel Downs16755% games+2.1% vs expected
Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen + Carven Albanese2449% games+1.2% vs expected
Jane Lucas + Leslie Moss3455% games−0.5% vs expected
Janel Downs + Carven Albanese8453% games−1.6% vs expected
Patricia Rinaldi + Nancy Meany8645% games−3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janel Downs
139W–93L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kelly Lash
16W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Eva Ortiz
69W–58L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
Penny Schmitt
73W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Sally Bednar
55W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Eliza Brown
26W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Lynn Enquist
86W–84L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Carven Albanese
51W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Jane Lucas
45W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Leslie Moss
50W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen
37W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
Nancy Meany
63W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Patricia Rinaldi
59W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Lynn Broder
31W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Catherine Giff
114W–98L career · 6 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Elizabeth Rose
30W–37L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jill Vollmer
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valerie D'Alexander
17W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.