Teams

CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating

2026 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-07-19vs 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/GiffWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristen Hoft / Janice Cavatoni vs Janel Downs / Sally Bednar3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLaura Buckley / Erika Jaeger vs Elizabeth Rose / Penny Schmitt6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Strating / Brooke Jaeger vs Nancy Meany / Patricia Rinaldi6-1, 6-1
2026-07-12vs MRC:Retro Slammers:Hawley/IslamWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Laura Buckley vs Kathy Bennett / Dana Manning6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Das Neves / Sharon Pratt vs Ana Murray / Jennifer StephenTorpey6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrooke Jaeger / Karen Strating vs Alexandra Cabral / Jill Vitti6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSharon Pratt / Danielle Muller-Yoo vs Andrea Fage / Jacqueline Bohan6-3, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChristine Burns / Jennifer Albanese vs Rovena Juman / Sarah Liddle6-2, 5-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah von Glahn / Laura Buckley vs Sylvia Swanson / Eileen Troise2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-13vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristen Hoft / Janice Cavatoni vs Terry Nolan / Stefanie Kreiger6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDanielle Muller-Yoo / Sharon Pratt vs Jean Bacon / Maggie Nava3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah von Glahn / Laura Buckley vs Arla Wiles / Linda Dest6-0, 6-2
2026-06-07vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan Hiam / Susanne Sparks vs Deidra Picciano / Pauline Hudson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanice Kopits / Erika Jaeger vs Audra Edele / Hyoun Choe7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobin Frankel / Laura Buckley vs Jeanne Priola / Lisa Frisbie6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSusanne Sparks / Joan Hiam vs Diane Essary / Janice Lucchesi6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrooke Jaeger / Janice Cavatoni vs Misao Naito / Priscilla Twombly6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Strating / Heidi Locke Simon vs Margaret Mehai / Nelida Reyes-Matos6-0, 6-1
2026-05-17vs GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/BlackWon 21
W#1 DoublesDanielle Muller-Yoo / Brooke Jaeger vs Catherine Dinauer / Deborah Montenegro6-3, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAileen Calnan-Burke / Sharon Pratt vs Suzanne Black / Debbie Kelly6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHeidi Locke Simon / Jennifer Albanese vs Dani Woods / Tanya Flynn3-6, 3-6
2026-04-26vs KH:Point Taken:ClarkeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Laura Buckley vs Michelle Dvorkin / Karen Bray6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKaren Strating / Deborah von Glahn vs Carol Kramer / Marjan Verhelst2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanice Kopits / Jennifer Millones vs Beth Pearce / Helene Neigler4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesMaria Das Neves / Danielle Muller-Yoo vs Joanna Douglas / Dara Lieberson1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Buckley / Lisa Samson vs Maja Sholler / Margaret Woolverton4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Burns / Brooke Jaeger vs Hiam Asmar / Lisa Metz6-2, 6-2
2026-04-11vs CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/RotheLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanice Cavatoni / Kristen Hoft vs Amy Lerner / Shelby Smith2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Albanese / Sharon Pratt vs Ann Zaminski / Fran Torres4-6, 3-4
W#3 DoublesAileen Calnan-Burke / Robin Frankel vs Limor Pompa / Diane Falconer6-4, 6-3
2026-03-29vs CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCallWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrooke Jaeger / Danielle Muller-Yoo vs Kathleen DiSalvatore / Sharon Hawkins6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLaura Buckley / Karen Strating vs Karen Greenblatt / Kristin Selvala6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoan Hiam / Susanne Sparks vs Kim Mixer / Felisse Starker6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/Rothe01125716208
2CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating01122821234
3CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCall01120825267
4CP:Brace Yourselves SENIORitas:Catto/Swanson01119926258
54S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff011171430264
6KH:Point Taken:Clarke011151433296
7GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/Black011131640316
8WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Hamelin/Eliseenkova011132044311
9MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven011121944329
10MRC:Ageless Aces:Dowd01172553360
11TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart/Lucchesi01162757364

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Robin Frankel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Karen Strating
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Janice Cavatoni
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.44
Christine Burns
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Susanne Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Sharon Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.39
Aileen Calnan-Burke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Jennifer Albanese
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Laura Buckley
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.27
Danielle Muller-Yoo
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Maria Das Neves
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Lisa Samson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Brooke Jaeger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Millones
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Joan Hiam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Hoft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Deborah von Glahn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Andrea Mancini
published 3.5
3.07
Heidi Locke Simon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Erika Jaeger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Janice Kopits
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Keri Cameron
published
Mary Cleary
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Cavatoni + Kristen Hoft171453% games+2.5% vs expected
Deborah von Glahn + Laura Buckley12260% games+1.6% vs expected
Andrea Mancini + Kristen Hoft3349% games−2.5% vs expected
Susanne Sparks + Lisa Samson3539% games−2.7% vs expected
Janice Kopits + Deborah von Glahn2938% games−10.9% vs expected
Susanne Sparks + Joan Hiam4361% gamesnot enough data
Janice Kopits + Karen Strating3247% gamesnot enough data
Christine Burns + Jennifer Albanese5064% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robin Frankel
56W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Karen Strating
106W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Janice Cavatoni
227W–104L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Christine Burns
130W–153L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Susanne Sparks
132W–210L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Sharon Pratt
48W–75L career · 7 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Aileen Calnan-Burke
97W–114L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
Jennifer Albanese
111W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Laura Buckley
128W–88L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Danielle Muller-Yoo
112W–94L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Maria Das Neves
159W–120L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Lisa Samson
112W–142L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Brooke Jaeger
77W–64L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Millones
26W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Joan Hiam
39W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Kristen Hoft
113W–79L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Deborah von Glahn
117W–120L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Andrea Mancini
155W–124L career · type A · no lines in 2026
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Heidi Locke Simon
49W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Erika Jaeger
29W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
Janice Kopits
77W–119L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
Keri Cameron
39W–76L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Cleary
7W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.