Teams

GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/Black

2026 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-07-19vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenLost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Dinauer / Kate Piironen vs Stefanie Kreiger / Lynn Atkins7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Black / Celia Ponvert vs Terry Nolan / Maggie Nava7-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesDebbie Kelly / Susan Dellenbaugh vs Susan Haven / Carol Finnucan1-6, 3-6
2026-07-11vs KH:Point Taken:ClarkeLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Kelly / Wendy Chicosky vs Marjan Verhelst / Nancy Huang2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKate Piironen / Leanne Jolin vs Michelle Dvorkin / Ingrid Mudge7-5, 4-6
2026-06-28vs 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/GiffLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Piironen / Jill Boffa vs Janel Downs / Kelly Lash0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Chicosky / Jennifer Wood vs Jane Lucas / Sally Bednar7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Montenegro / Jennifer Young vs Eliza Brown / Patricia Rinaldi6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-06vs CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/RotheLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Dinauer / Wendy Chicosky vs Amy Lerner / Nicole Berman2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Dellenbaugh / Jennifer Young vs Lesley Kalenson / Daniela Sansone0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDani Woods / Suzanne Black vs Annemarie Rothe / Jane Hentemann6-4, 6-7
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wood / Jill Boffa vs Claire Hurley / Nadine Tanen3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCelia Ponvert / Tanya Flynn vs Joanna Douglas / Jacqueline Passios6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Young / Susan Dellenbaugh vs Anna Eliseenkova / Kelly Fagan1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesCatherine Dinauer / Deborah Montenegro vs Danielle Muller-Yoo / Brooke Jaeger3-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Black / Debbie Kelly vs Aileen Calnan-Burke / Sharon Pratt3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDani Woods / Tanya Flynn vs Heidi Locke Simon / Jennifer Albanese6-3, 6-3
2026-05-03vs CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCallLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Kate Piironen vs Beth Nechamkin / Alissa Wilson2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Black / Celia Ponvert vs Robyn Cameron / Kim Mixer4-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMary Glidden / Dani Woods vs Kathryn Pizzuto / Sharon Hawkins3-6, 4-6
2026-04-26vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Montenegro / Kate Piironen vs Jacqueline Mulhall / Patricia Fusco6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDebbie Kelly / Wendy Chicosky vs Jodi Wasserstein / Deborah Modzelewski6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Wood / Jill Boffa vs Jeanne Priola / Rae Varrone6-4, 6-3
2026-04-19vs MRC:Retro Slammers:Hawley/IslamWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Catherine Dinauer vs Karyn Detje / Julie Mooney6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Chicosky / Debbie Kelly vs Lisa Moore / Silvia Islam6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDani Woods / Mary Glidden vs Kathy Bennett / Nancy Hawley2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesDeborah Montenegro / Catherine Dinauer vs Helene Ginsburg / Christine Moore6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJill Boffa / Jennifer Wood vs Tina Reiser / Carol Myers3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Kelly / Suzanne Black vs Ellen Leigh / Jacqueline Bohan5-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMaureen Goodrich / Deborah Montenegro vs Loretta Bohnen / Diane Essary6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKate Piironen / Susan Dellenbaugh vs Janice Lucchesi / Priscilla Twombly2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Black / Celia Ponvert vs Cheryl Dziubina / Margaret Mehai6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/Rothe01125716208
2CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating01122821234
3CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCall01120825267
4CP:Brace Yourselves SENIORitas:Catto/Swanson01119926258
54S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff011171430264
6KH:Point Taken:Clarke011151433296
7GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/Black011131640316
8WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Hamelin/Eliseenkova011132044311
9MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven011121944329
10MRC:Ageless Aces:Dowd01172553360
11TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart/Lucchesi01162757364

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Celia Ponvert
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Dani Woods
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Maureen Goodrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Wendy Chicosky
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.34
Catherine Dinauer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Kate Piironen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Deborah Montenegro
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Debbie Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Jennifer Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Leanne Jolin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Suzanne Black
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Tanya Flynn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Mary Glidden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Young
published
Jill Boffa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Susan Dellenbaugh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Dinauer + Maureen Goodrich9062% games+8.0% vs expected
Catherine Dinauer + Kate Piironen6163% games+6.0% vs expected
Deborah Montenegro + Kate Piironen12956% games+5.3% vs expected
Deborah Montenegro + Maureen Goodrich4266% games+3.0% vs expected
Celia Ponvert + Suzanne Black6162% games+2.8% vs expected
Deborah Montenegro + Catherine Dinauer13656% games+2.4% vs expected
Maureen Goodrich + Debbie Kelly10754% games+0.4% vs expected
Wendy Chicosky + Maureen Goodrich5257% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Celia Ponvert
172W–104L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Dani Woods
132W–120L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.66
Maureen Goodrich
127W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Wendy Chicosky
54W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Catherine Dinauer
97W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Kate Piironen
66W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Deborah Montenegro
73W–63L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Debbie Kelly
61W–69L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Wood
14W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Leanne Jolin
39W–50L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Suzanne Black
82W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Tanya Flynn
96W–68L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Mary Glidden
27W–64L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Jennifer Young
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jill Boffa
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Dellenbaugh
35W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.