Teams

CP:Brace Yourselves SENIORitas:Catto/Swanson

2026 SCT Adult 55 & Over Women - Weekend · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1

25 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-07-26vs 4S:Love To Play:Ortiz/GiffWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeanna Santoro / Sarah Liddle vs Elizabeth Rose / Penny Schmitt6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Blenk / Eileen Troise vs Ruth van Den Nieuwenhuizen / Leslie Moss6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Corrado / Louise Hagstrom vs Carven Albanese / Patricia Rinaldi6-7, 3-6
2026-07-19vs CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCallWon 21
W#1 DoublesHelen Chun / Louise Hagstrom vs Kathleen DiSalvatore / Alissa Wilson6-3, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDeanna Santoro / Sarah Liddle vs Sharon Hawkins / Leslie Lombino4-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBonnie Aves / Emily Catto vs Kim Mixer / Robyn Cameron4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesAndrea Fage / Jacqueline Bohan vs Sharon Pratt / Danielle Muller-Yoo3-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRovena Juman / Sarah Liddle vs Christine Burns / Jennifer Albanese2-6, 6-5
L#3 DoublesSylvia Swanson / Eileen Troise vs Deborah von Glahn / Laura Buckley6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMarlena Simmons / Felicia DeSanto vs Priscilla Twombly / Diana Louw3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Moore / Yvonne Iversen vs Janice Lucchesi / Dale Norton6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEllen Leigh / Jacqueline Bohan vs Susan Tibbetts / Diana Jackson6-1, 6-1
2026-05-31vs MRC:Retro Slammers:Hawley/IslamWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Blenk / Rovena Juman vs Betsy Demeyer / Dana Manning6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarol Myers / Tina Reiser vs Nancy Anderson / Ana Murray7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Corrado / Nancy Ossenfort vs Karen Hanley / Lisa Moore3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-17vs MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/HavenLost 12
L#1 DoublesYvonne Iversen / Judy Bloom vs Julie Bastarache / Lynn Atkins6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBonnie Aves / Nancy Ossenfort vs Maggie Nava / Nadine Morandi6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEmily Catto / Helen Chun vs Joyce Somers / Dika Nussberg6-4, 6-1
2026-05-03vs MRC:Ageless Aces:DowdWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarlena Simmons / Felicia DeSanto vs Audra Edele / Hyoun Choe6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEileen Troise / Yvonne Iversen vs Jeanine Powers / Patricia Fusco6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesSylvia Swanson / Judy Bloom vs Jodi Wasserstein / Melinda Grice6-3, 6-2
2026-04-19vs KH:Point Taken:ClarkeWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Blenk / Jacqueline Bohan vs Ingrid Mudge / Michelle Dvorkin6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Andrea Fage vs Carla Carroll / Marjan Verhelst4-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSylvia Swanson / Rovena Juman vs Helene Neigler / Myrna Gardner6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesAndrea Fage / Eileen Troise vs Nadine Tanen / Jennifer Barry6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHelen Chun / Tina Reiser vs Anna Eliseenkova / Kelly Fagan6-0, 6-3
2026-03-22vs GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/BlackWon 21
L#1 DoublesHelene Ginsburg / Christine Moore vs Deborah Montenegro / Catherine Dinauer3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTina Reiser / Carol Myers vs Jill Boffa / Jennifer Wood6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEllen Leigh / Jacqueline Bohan vs Debbie Kelly / Suzanne Black7-5, 6-1
2026-03-21vs CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/RotheWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarlena Simmons / Helen Chun vs Kim Athan / Elizabeth Auch6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLouise Hagstrom / Jennifer Corrado vs Daniela Sansone / Dina Weinstein4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJudy Bloom / Eileen Troise vs Limor Pompa / Shelby Smith6-3, 5-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Women - 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP: Silver Foxes:Sansone/Rothe01125716208
2CP:No Regrets Summer 2026:das Neves/Strating01122821234
3CP:55 Shades of Play:Stone/McCall01120825267
4CP:Brace Yourselves SENIORitas:Catto/Swanson01119926258
54S:Love To Play:Ortiz/Giff011171430264
6KH:Point Taken:Clarke011151433296
7GF:Kiss My Ace 2:Goodrich/Black011131640316
8WRC:Sorry Not Sorry:Hamelin/Eliseenkova011132044311
9MIT:In It To Win It: Nava/Haven011121944329
10MRC:Ageless Aces:Dowd01172553360
11TRC:Doubles or Nothing:Zwart/Lucchesi01162757364

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Helen Chun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Felicia DeSanto
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Bonnie Aves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Jennifer Corrado
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Sarah Liddle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Carol Myers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Deanna Santoro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Jacqueline Bohan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Kathy Blenk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Eileen Troise
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Christine Moore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Sylvia Swanson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Helene Ginsburg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Yvonne Iversen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Ellen Leigh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Alexandra Nicklas
published 3.5
3.09
Rovena Juman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Andrea Fage
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Marlena Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3
2.95
Louise Hagstrom
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.91
Nancy Ossenfort
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.83
Lori Tenan
published
2.80
Tina Reiser
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Emily Catto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Judy Bloom
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Ossenfort + Louise Hagstrom10168% games+10.3% vs expected
Sylvia Swanson + Deanna Santoro8161% games+9.8% vs expected
Marlena Simmons + Kathy Blenk7555% games+9.3% vs expected
Sylvia Swanson + Tina Reiser16458% games+5.8% vs expected
Marlena Simmons + Tina Reiser221255% games+4.7% vs expected
Emily Catto + Sylvia Swanson13952% games+1.2% vs expected
Felicia DeSanto + Jennifer Corrado3452% games+1.2% vs expected
Deanna Santoro + Sarah Liddle141249% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Chun
227W–220L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Felicia DeSanto
212W–167L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Bonnie Aves
301W–195L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Jennifer Corrado
128W–170L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Sarah Liddle
108W–111L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Carol Myers
109W–144L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Deanna Santoro
93W–92L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Jacqueline Bohan
96W–79L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Kathy Blenk
118W–106L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Eileen Troise
87W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Christine Moore
158W–152L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Sylvia Swanson
157W–145L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Helene Ginsburg
82W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Yvonne Iversen
110W–127L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Ellen Leigh
102W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Alexandra Nicklas
93W–60L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Rovena Juman
93W–106L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Andrea Fage
173W–151L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Marlena Simmons
183W–175L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Louise Hagstrom
118W–110L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Nancy Ossenfort
141W–175L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Lori Tenan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.83
3
Tina Reiser
126W–101L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Emily Catto
94W–106L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Judy Bloom
46W–43L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.