Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/Bickmore

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W PM

15 players · average NTRP 3.18 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-11vs Sports Mall-Rollins/ArmstrongWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlison Pearce / Dawn Farrell vs Brooke Rollins / Lisa Pappas6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Byington / Nicole Leatham vs Penny Gambill / Emilee Bagley6-3, 6-1
2021-08-09Won 20
W#2 DoublesAlison Pearce / Dawn Farrell vs Yoko Walljasper / DeeAnn Henderson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShanna Sirstins / Linda Byington vs Mary Jayne Child / Trisha Cutrer6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesDawn Farrell / Karla Block vs Magdalena Kovacsovics / Nicole Fisher4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathrine Wright / Nicole Leatham vs Alison Parsons / Erin Arico6-1, 7-6
2021-07-28vs South Jordan-SantiagoWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarla Block / Dawn Farrell vs Kalaiselvi Seetharaman / Tonya Huff5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKate Franko vs Maryam Klock2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Byington / Nicole Leatham vs Angela Santiago / Carrie Larsen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-14vs Sports Mall-Rollins/ArmstrongSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJaNean Nelson / Dawn Farrell vs Stacy Higbee / Stephanie Favila6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMari Bickmore / Nicole Leatham vs Lisa Armstrong / Kim Kunde3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-10Won 21
W#1 SinglesDawn Farrell vs Amber Thompson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Pearce / Delia Bayna vs Angela Jensen / Molly Adams2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathrine Wright / Nicole Leatham vs Kari Majors / Sue White6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlison Pearce vs Jane Chandramouli7-6, 6-6
L#2 DoublesMari Bickmore / Kate Franko vs Stephanie Gelman / Robin Asmar4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKarla Block / Linda Byington vs Suzanne Headden / Shelly Logue6-1, 7-6
2021-06-23vs South Jordan-SantiagoWon 21
W#1 SinglesAlison Pearce vs Kalaiselvi Seetharaman6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMari Bickmore / Kate Franko vs Ann Chenoweth / Angela Santiago6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLISA PERMENTER / Stef Charlesworth vs Katie Rose / Emma Li2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Dawn Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.07
Linda Byington
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Alison Pearce
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Nicole Leatham
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.98
JaNean Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
2.68
Kate Franko
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Kathrine Wright
published 3
2.56
LISA PERMENTER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Karla Block
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.32
Mari Bickmore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Shanna Sirstins
published
Stef Charlesworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Delia Bayna + JaNean Nelson91050% games+10.1% vs expected
Nicole Leatham + Linda Byington10359% games+6.0% vs expected
Dawn Farrell + Alison Pearce13953% games+4.0% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Jennifer Tooley21044% games+0.9% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Delia Bayna2738% games+0.3% vs expected
Mari Bickmore + Karla Block81144% games−1.1% vs expected
Mari Bickmore + Nicole Leatham1440% games−3.6% vs expected
Karla Block + JaNean Nelson3446% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Tooley
198W–228L career · 15 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dawn Farrell
127W–112L career · 6 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
Linda Byington
78W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Alison Pearce
171W–202L career · 5 lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
3.06
Nicole Leatham
108W–121L career · 5 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
JaNean Nelson
116W–137L career · type A · 18 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Kate Franko
50W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 17 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 10 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Kathrine Wright
39W–41L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
LISA PERMENTER
72W–124L career · 1 line in 2021
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Karla Block
108W–230L career · type A · 14 lines in 2021
77%23%<1%
2.40
3
Mari Bickmore
87W–239L career · type A · 12 lines in 2021
92%8%<1%
2.32
Shanna Sirstins
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stef Charlesworth
45W–116L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.