Teams

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot

2022 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 3.88 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings12 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aced It10229723266
2Whiskey Tango Foxtrot102261027292
3Untouchaballs93261025277
4Mixed Love93201640324
5Tennisious75241227286
6ETC Hitters75221437309
7Team Frame66152147365
8Lovin' Every Day57171944353
9Sets Addicts39102655387
10Mixtape Spinners3992756380
11Fuzzy Balls21082858379
12Win or Booze 7.501282860385

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Trever Browne
published 4
4.00
Debbie Merritt
published 4
3.99
Kerri Porritt
published 4.5
3.92
Fazal Shariff
published 4
3.84
Diana Gastanaga
published 4
3.83
3.77
Paula Lawson
published 4
3.75
Kirk Porritt
published 4
3.75
Karl Baughman
published 4
3.62
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
3.39
Zel Mertz
published 3.5
3.39
James Mertz
published 3.5
3.37
John Chavez
published 3.5
3.31
Erin Kohler
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.27
Luke Felt
published 3.5
3.00
Kimberly Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Ryan Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Mitchell + John Chavez13957% games+6.2% vs expected
Kerri Porritt + John Chavez9362% games+5.3% vs expected
Zel Mertz + Karl Baughman7355% games+1.8% vs expected
Zel Mertz + James Mertz271058% games+0.4% vs expected
Kerri Porritt + Kirk Porritt3642% games−4.4% vs expected
James Mertz + Kimberly Stewart26859% gamesnot enough data
Fazal Shariff + Kimberly Stewart12454% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Stewart + Ryan Stewart9362% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Trever Browne
150W–115L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
4.02
4
Debbie Merritt
230W–129L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
4.00
4.5
Kerri Porritt
126W–66L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Fazal Shariff
162W–72L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Diana Gastanaga
121W–79L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Lisa Trujillo-Dunn
188W–132L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Paula Lawson
203W–118L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Kirk Porritt
221W–136L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Karl Baughman
180W–94L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–67L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Zel Mertz
335W–191L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
James Mertz
187W–123L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
John Chavez
181W–102L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Erin Kohler
155W–119L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Luke Felt
101W–105L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
4
Jennifer Mitchell
164W–142L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
Kimberly Stewart
91W–44L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Stewart
82W–102L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.