Teams

WSC-Party at the Net-Krammer

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

22 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-02-25vs STC-StrobleWon 31
L#1 DoublesRenee Sedghinasab / Asawari Chingale vs Karen Beaudry / Patricia Brooke2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaine Meadows vs Alicia Wright6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTammi Tompkins / Karen Ng vs Catherine Davidson / Erin Coomer6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTammy Besel / Shyra Gardai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-19vs AYTC-ZimmerWon 31
W#1 DoublesLucy Zhang / Asawari Chingale vs Meg Viera / Jesenka Berberovich6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLaine Meadows vs Rebecca Zimmer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanielle Adams / Nancy Rodriguez vs Lori Estes / Heather Slee3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHaley Neff-LaFord / Snezhana Stefanova vs Cheryl Borgonia / Kari Brunson1-6, 3-6
2023-02-11vs CP-TNT-SikkaWon 31
L#1 DoublesJacque Cao / Cynthia Padilla vs Tessa Chen / Tracy Brodahl5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLaine Meadows vs Jia Cui6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBridget Greenberg / Kathy Tsutsumoto vs Mallica Sikka / Mingming Zhan7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSavitha Krammer / Lucy Zhang vs Amy Wang / Karen Choi7-5, 6-3
2023-02-05vs EDG-HigginsWon 31
L#1 DoublesCristin Donovan / Savitha Krammer vs Debbie Batteiger / Laura Rochford2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLaine Meadows vs Mary Adkins7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSoo Chin / Mabel Tang vs Kayoko Price / Sally Witt6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBridget Greenberg / Kathy Tsutsumoto vs Debbie Gliner / Wendy Redding7-5, 6-0
2023-02-04vs STC-StrobleWon 31
W#1 DoublesRenee Sedghinasab / Margaret Landry-Navarro vs Catherine Davidson / Alexa Helsell McIntyre6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaine Meadows vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Padilla / Nancy Rodriguez vs Rachel Stroble / Courtney Williams4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShyra Gardai / Danielle Adams vs Corinne Crabs / Eda Topur6-2, 6-1
2023-01-28vs ETC-Richardson-LanderSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCristin Donovan / Savitha Krammer vs Cynthia Kim / Donna Kim6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLaine Meadows vs Meta Lee5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJacque Cao / Soo Chin vs Aasa Holmgren / Ann Swiftney4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBridget Greenberg / Kathy Tsutsumoto vs Claudia Sadro / Zena Heywood6-0, 6-2
2023-01-21vs NTC-Lady Falcons-LupinacciSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCristin Donovan / Savitha Krammer vs Priscilla Cypiot / Sonya Teele6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLaine Meadows vs Hania Younis5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacque Cao / Renee Sedghinasab vs Stephanie Hill / Becky Jhu5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Adams / Shyra Gardai vs Galen Sherlock / Leona Zamora6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-01-15vs PSC-Azure-PetriucSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCynthia Padilla / Soo Chin vs Smaranda Lieuallen / Alina Stanciu2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLaine Meadows vs Mihaela Frintu6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBridget Greenberg / Kathy Tsutsumoto vs Judit Velcsov / Irina Petriuc2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMabel Tang / Karen Ng vs Dana Cozmei / Gabi Ifrim6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Mabel Tang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Asawari Chingale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Lucy Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Savitha Krammer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Laine Meadows
usually #1 Singles 90%, also #1 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
2.96
Danielle Adams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Cynthia Padilla
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.87
Cristin Donovan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Tammi Tompkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Soo Chin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Snezhana Stefanova
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Nancy Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Karen Ng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.65
Margaret Landry-Navarro
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.59
Haley Neff-LaFord
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.58
Renee Sedghinasab
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.54
Bridget Greenberg
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.46
Kathy Tsutsumoto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.35
Jacque Cao
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.31
Tammy Besel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lara Kwiatkowski
published
Shyra Gardai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Savitha Krammer + Asawari Chingale5159% games+11.6% vs expected
Tammi Tompkins + Margaret Landry-Navarro8355% games+5.4% vs expected
Lucy Zhang + Savitha Krammer211356% games+4.1% vs expected
Karen Ng + Mabel Tang11458% games+3.5% vs expected
Soo Chin + Tammi Tompkins211259% games+2.6% vs expected
Cristin Donovan + Savitha Krammer11752% games+1.7% vs expected
Soo Chin + Cristin Donovan5154% games−3.1% vs expected
Margaret Landry-Navarro + Nancy Rodriguez71045% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mabel Tang
132W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Asawari Chingale
26W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Lucy Zhang
127W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Savitha Krammer
92W–63L career · 6 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Laine Meadows
44W–59L career · 10 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Danielle Adams
35W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.96
3.5
Cynthia Padilla
58W–108L career · 9 lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Cristin Donovan
70W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Tammi Tompkins
69W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Soo Chin
121W–81L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Snezhana Stefanova
42W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Nancy Rodriguez
52W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
2.5
Karen Ng
66W–50L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%11%89%
2.67
3
Margaret Landry-Navarro
86W–95L career · 6 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Haley Neff-LaFord
31W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
2.59
3
Renee Sedghinasab
55W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Bridget Greenberg
36W–56L career · 7 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Kathy Tsutsumoto
37W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Jacque Cao
30W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.35
2.5
Tammy Besel
59W–75L career · 1 line in 2023
0%92%8%
2.31
Lara Kwiatkowski
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Shyra Gardai
23W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.