Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Torres

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.41 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-03vs Salt Lake Tennis-BickmoreWon 10
W#2 DoublesKate Franko / Davinia Lyon vs Mari Bickmore / Maria von Ellm - McKenna6-2, 6-2
2023-05-22Split 11
W#2 SinglesChantel Vu vs Carrie Larsen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKate Franko / Davinia Lyon vs Angela Santiago / Kalaiselvi Seetharaman4-6, 4-6
2023-05-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesChantel Vu / Maria Pettit vs Christine Gouff / Kim Ward6-2, 6-2
2023-05-08vs Salt Lake Tennis-BickmoreWon 10
W#3 DoublesChantel Vu / Sara Nejatifar vs Mariam Azin / LISA PERMENTER6-2, 7-5
2023-05-01Split 11
W#1 DoublesDavinia Lyon / Jennifer Tooley vs Cinda Taylor / Danielle Martin6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSara Nejatifar / Chantel Vu vs Brenda Green / Nancy Miller5-7, 0-6
2023-04-29vs Sports Mall-Peterson/FarrWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Tooley / Davinia Lyon vs Lexi Farr / Chelsea Wood3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSherrie Hatch / Sara Nejatifar vs Emily Matheson / Jamie Crews1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesMary Jayne Child / Davinia Lyon vs Naomi Stroud-Peterson / Tori Locke6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Emilee Hurley
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.58
Elma Tatarevic
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.52
Kassie Torres
published 4
3.30
Chantel Vu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Jamie DeLong
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Diane Poole
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.85
Maria Pettit
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.84
Davinia Lyon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Sara Nejatifar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Kate Franko
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
Mary Jayne Child
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Nicole Huston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Sherrie Hatch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie DeLong + Nicole Huston15564% games+11.1% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Sherrie Hatch6260% games+10.5% vs expected
Kassie Torres + Jamie DeLong121053% games+6.9% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Jamie DeLong4257% games+4.0% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Maria Pettit12953% games−0.3% vs expected
Mary Jayne Child + Jennifer Tooley2843% games−2.4% vs expected
Sara Nejatifar + Kassie Torres9950% games−6.0% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Davinia Lyon2439% games−7.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emilee Hurley
95W–51L career · 7 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Elma Tatarevic
128W–82L career · 14 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Kassie Torres
180W–119L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Chantel Vu
88W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Jamie DeLong
171W–129L career · 11 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
197W–228L career · 18 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Diane Poole
191W–163L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Maria Pettit
187W–196L career · 14 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Davinia Lyon
61W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Sara Nejatifar
65W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Kate Franko
50W–65L career · 9 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Mary Jayne Child
49W–107L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicole Huston
37W–23L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherrie Hatch
30W–39L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.