Teams

CDTA S 18&OW4.0 h.Glenbrook Gray Tue 6:30 $25

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

18 players · average NTRP 4.15 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesDayle Levine / Jill Rudman vs Linda Borst / Nora Errico6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaurie Gray / Alison Donnelly vs Lici Lytle / Amanda Cuca6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeidi Nickel / Dayle Levine vs Ela Lewis / Reatha Kay6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJessica Kray / Lisa Hans vs Shelley Turk / Vina Maniquis6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesEiko Tamaki / Heidi Nickel vs Ana Chang / Carolyn Walden5-7, 6-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLynn Mueller vs Haina Shin4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Grady / Jessica Kray vs Dawn Pollack / Jennifer Koo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEiko Tamaki / Lisa Hans vs Emma Moon / Renee Zha6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesDayle Levine / Heidi Nickel vs Julia Povilaitis / Angela Tsang6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaurie Gray / Kathleen McLaughlin vs Noreen Ohcana / Johanna Raimond6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHoda Elshakankery / Laurie Gray vs Christine Meade / Erin Alvarez4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHeidi Nickel / Jill Rudman vs Jean Soh / Cheryl Imo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie Gray / Lisa Hans vs Mary Cooper / Anna Dau0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLynn Mueller / Heidi Nickel vs Rosemary Wheeler / Rebecca Kosner3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW4.0 g.Tam Corey Mon 7 $2261231228235
2CDTA S 18&OW4.0 h.Glenbrook Gray Tue 6:30 $2552241128269
3CDTA S 18&OW4.0 f.McFetridge Lund Fri 7:30 $2052211431250
4CDTA S 18&OW4.0 e.Heritage Chmieleski Thur 7 $2143181737285
5CDTA S 18&OW4.0 b.Centennial Nemec Thur 7 $2034201537294
6CDTA S 18&OW4.0 c.MT Bann Zepeda Wed 6:30 $2525161939271
7CDTA S 18&OW4.0 d.McFetridge Newson Sat 7 $2025132248318
8CDTA S 18&OW4.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 1 $281653062395

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Emily Shamrock
published 4.5
4.16
Hoda Elshakankery
published 4.5
4.02
Sophie Dimoff
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.84
Alison Donnelly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.77
KAREN MAJERCZAK
published 4
Dayle Levine
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Eiko Tamaki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Heidi Nickel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.69
Gayle Dominicis
published 4
3.64
Laurie Gray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Youngran Chung
published 4
3.46
3.34
Lisa Hans
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Jennifer Grady
published
Jessica Kray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Rudman
published
Kathleen McLaughlin
published
Lynn Mueller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dayle Levine + Heidi Nickel10263% games+11.5% vs expected
Lisa Hans + Gayle Dominicis14262% games+7.8% vs expected
Hoda Elshakankery + Gayle Dominicis632059% games+2.4% vs expected
Alison Donnelly + Gayle Dominicis5257% games+2.4% vs expected
Hoda Elshakankery + Laurie Gray331260% games+1.8% vs expected
Alison Donnelly + Laurie Gray18761% games+1.0% vs expected
Laurie Gray + Gayle Dominicis533152% games−0.7% vs expected
Youngran Chung + Lisa Hans4743% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emily Shamrock
123W–81L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Hoda Elshakankery
216W–111L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
4.16
Sophie Dimoff
78W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
4.5
Alison Donnelly
119W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.84
4
KAREN MAJERCZAK
160W–108L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Dayle Levine
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Eiko Tamaki
27W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Heidi Nickel
88W–80L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Gayle Dominicis
229W–135L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Laurie Gray
162W–113L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Youngran Chung
76W–87L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Pamela Leichtling
49W–113L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.46
Lisa Hans
71W–103L career · 5 lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.34
Jennifer Grady
78W–58L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Kray
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Rudman
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen McLaughlin
29W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Mueller
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.