Teams

CDTA S 18&OW4.0 g.Tam Corey Mon 7 $22

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

19 players · average NTRP 4.04 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesMartha Davis / Ashley Kaufman vs Kitty Swanson / Terri Whiting3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMartha Davis / Christine Meade vs Kristen Coy / Dani Zepeda4-6, 3-5
W#3 DoublesEileen Lee / Angela Hanson vs Sheila Bondoc / Mary Cooper4-6, 6-5
L#1 DoublesDawn Baumann / Martha Davis vs Keara Miller / Ashley Boduch6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJean Soh / Angela Hanson vs Ana Chang / Emily Doyle1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Weidner / Rebecca Daly vs Jendy Barnes / Angela Anglin Weathers6-7, 4-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartha Davis / Silvia Kusaka vs Jennifer Nemec / Meaghan Flynn6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRebecca Daly vs Angela Tsang3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Weidner / Eileen Lee vs Alexandra Gorodiski / Noreen Ohcana5-7, 4-5
W#1 DoublesGinger Riessen / Martha Davis vs Dauwn Houston / Maura Starshak6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTeodora Varcheva vs Andrea Grahe6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Daly / Julie Weidner vs Kathryn Cattafesta / Shelley Turk6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMartha Davis / Dawn Baumann vs Alison Donnelly / KAREN MAJERCZAK6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJean Soh / Cheryl Imo vs Heidi Nickel / Jill Rudman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCheryl Imo / Maria Lobo-Corey vs Bethany Pickens / Sarah Young6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRebecca Daly vs Bahareh Shirkhanloo6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW4.0 g.Tam Corey Mon 7 $2261231228235
2CDTA S 18&OW4.0 h.Glenbrook Gray Tue 6:30 $2552241128269
3CDTA S 18&OW4.0 f.McFetridge Lund Fri 7:30 $2052211431250
4CDTA S 18&OW4.0 e.Heritage Chmieleski Thur 7 $2143181737285
5CDTA S 18&OW4.0 b.Centennial Nemec Thur 7 $2034201537294
6CDTA S 18&OW4.0 c.MT Bann Zepeda Wed 6:30 $2525161939271
7CDTA S 18&OW4.0 d.McFetridge Newson Sat 7 $2025132248318
8CDTA S 18&OW4.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 1 $281653062395

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Erin Alvarez
published 4.5
4.11
Christine Meade
published 4.5
4.00
Ginger Riessen
published 4
3.95
Dawn Baumann
published 4
3.87
Silvia Kusaka
published 4
3.87
Masako Ueda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.82
Jean Soh
published 4
Ashley Kaufman
published 4
Cheryl Imo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Monique Melnick
published 4
3.69
Eileen Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Teodora Varcheva
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.61
3.61
Julie Weidner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Sue Wissing
published 4
3.56
Martha Davis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.55
Angela Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Rebecca Daly
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Maria Lobo-Corey
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Soh + Maria Lobo-Corey6458% games+15.0% vs expected
Stephanie Thompson + Masako Ueda9165% games+11.0% vs expected
Christine Meade + Angela Hanson18859% games+10.5% vs expected
Martha Davis + Ginger Riessen5259% games+8.9% vs expected
Silvia Kusaka + Julie Weidner11260% games+8.5% vs expected
Martha Davis + Christine Meade12562% games+7.4% vs expected
Jean Soh + Silvia Kusaka15264% games+7.3% vs expected
Christine Meade + Julie Weidner7259% games+6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Alvarez
45W–27L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Christine Meade
279W–180L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
4.11
4
Ginger Riessen
244W–127L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Silvia Kusaka
232W–160L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
Masako Ueda
166W–96L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Jean Soh
468W–283L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Ashley Kaufman
31W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cheryl Imo
64W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Monique Melnick
93W–91L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Eileen Lee
136W–123L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Teodora Varcheva
103W–129L career · 1 line in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Stephanie Thompson
146W–154L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Julie Weidner
167W–156L career · 3 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Sue Wissing
64W–48L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Martha Davis
349W–162L career · 6 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Angela Hanson
119W–137L career · 2 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
Rebecca Daly
129W–147L career · 4 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Maria Lobo-Corey
276W–244L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.