Teams

CDTA S 18&OW4.0 f.McFetridge Lund Fri 7:30 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

21 players · average NTRP 3.96 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Walden / Dawn Pollack vs Lici Lytle / Nora Errico2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAna Chang / Emily Doyle vs Jean Soh / Angela Hanson6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCarolyn Walden vs Christine Meade1-6, 0-6
2023-06-23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesCarolyn Walden vs Tracy Merrell1-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAna Chang / Carolyn Walden vs Eiko Tamaki / Heidi Nickel7-5, 5-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSavanna Rhodes vs Sophie Dimoff1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Pollack / Jennifer Koo vs Jennifer Grady / Jessica Kray6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesEmily Doyle / Ana Chang vs Roida Simbolon / Dauwn Houston6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMary Pat Barbarie vs Meghan Ahlgrim4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura Purcell / Alja Hessami-Maas vs Maria Lourdes Bandelow / Shelley Turk6-7, 1-3
L#2 SinglesSavanna Rhodes vs Reatha Kay2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Walden / Ana Chang vs Sarah Blankenbaker / Carlie Frisch6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDawn Pollack / Laura Purcell vs Emma Moon / Linda Wolf6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW4.0 g.Tam Corey Mon 7 $2261231228235
2CDTA S 18&OW4.0 h.Glenbrook Gray Tue 6:30 $2552241128269
3CDTA S 18&OW4.0 f.McFetridge Lund Fri 7:30 $2052211431250
4CDTA S 18&OW4.0 e.Heritage Chmieleski Thur 7 $2143181737285
5CDTA S 18&OW4.0 b.Centennial Nemec Thur 7 $2034201537294
6CDTA S 18&OW4.0 c.MT Bann Zepeda Wed 6:30 $2525161939271
7CDTA S 18&OW4.0 d.McFetridge Newson Sat 7 $2025132248318
8CDTA S 18&OW4.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 1 $281653062395

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.84 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Emily Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Keara Miller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.23
Laura Levin
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
4.03
Ana Chang
published 4
3.96
Monika Nalepa
published 4
3.95
Haina Shin
published 4
3.79
3.76
Carolyn Walden
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Andrea Kerwin
published 4
3.72
Ashley Boduch
published 4
3.69
Laura Purcell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Dawn Pollack
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Emily Lund
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Alja Hessami-Maas
published 3.5
3.29
Lida Downey
published 3.5
Jendy Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Jennifer Koo
published
Jennifer Peck
published
Mary Pat Barbarie
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Maureen Burns
published
Savanna Rhodes
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Boduch + Keara Miller221157% games+9.4% vs expected
Alja Hessami-Maas + Dawn Pollack1835% games+8.8% vs expected
Alja Hessami-Maas + Emily Lund23662% games+8.0% vs expected
Ana Chang + Emily Doyle24963% games+6.1% vs expected
Haina Shin + Ana Chang6359% games+5.3% vs expected
Laura Levin + Angela Anglin Weathers4257% games+3.7% vs expected
Alja Hessami-Maas + Laura Purcell345945% games+2.9% vs expected
Laura Levin + Keara Miller6256% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emily Doyle
132W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
4.39
Keara Miller
143W–119L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.28
Laura Levin
62W–39L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Ana Chang
210W–115L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Monika Nalepa
76W–59L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Haina Shin
290W–131L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Angela Anglin Weathers
130W–94L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Carolyn Walden
11W–18L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Andrea Kerwin
24W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ashley Boduch
51W–48L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
Laura Purcell
158W–161L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Dawn Pollack
90W–111L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Emily Lund
256W–130L career · 2 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Alja Hessami-Maas
214W–213L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Lida Downey
38W–75L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Jendy Barnes
41W–45L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Koo
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Peck
115W–55L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Pat Barbarie
21W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Maureen Burns
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Savanna Rhodes
21W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.