← Search

Laura Levin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicago, IL
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 84W–45L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history129 matches
L
2026-10-10 · CHI E 18W4.5 5.Wilm Miller Fri 7 $20 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rachel Pungwe
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-5
L
2026-09-27 · CHI E 40W4.5 4.NBRC Burns Sat 3 $30 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Ellsworth
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-5
L
2026-04-04 · CDTA W 18&OW4.5 5.Wlmt Miller Fri 7 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Melanie Berends - (DQ)
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Stenmark
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-2
L
2026-02-07 · CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Thompson
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-5
W
2026-01-24 · CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · CDTA W TriWMid 6.Tam Landt Sat 7 $22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Keara Miller
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-2
W
2026-01-17 · CDTA W 40&OW4.5 4.Wlmt Burns Sat 5 $20 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-22 · CDTA E 40&OW4.5 4Gnbk Burns Sat 3 $30 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-2
W
2025-11-16 · CDTA F ComboW8.5 2Nielsen Lund Sun 3 $22 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mira Struck
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-11-15 · CDTA E 40&OW4.5 4Gnbk Burns Sat 3 $30 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Ihlanfeldt
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-4
L
2025-11-09 · CDTA E 18&OW4.5 1Cent Miller Fri 7 $20 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Kerwin
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 61.9% of games
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.4% of games
4.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 69.3% of games
4.5
61.8%
34W–21L · 56.8% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 52.3% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 38.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#1 Singles
28%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal