Teams

CDTA S 18&OW4.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 1 $28

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

18 players · average NTRP 3.86 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesDauwn Houston / Chandana Namburi vs Hoda Elshakankery / Gayle Dominicis6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesClaudia Moscoso-Cordero vs KAREN MAJERCZAK4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEla Lewis / Reatha Kay vs Heidi Nickel / Dayle Levine0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesShelley Turk / Vina Maniquis vs Jessica Kray / Lisa Hans1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDauwn Houston / Jean Sawin vs Meaghan Flynn / Christine Marschall2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesReatha Kay vs Anne-Laure Provo0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesShelley Turk vs Elizabeth Fraser2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesClaudia Moscoso-Cordero vs Svetlana Petrova2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesReatha Kay / Maria Lourdes Bandelow vs Nora Errico / Joni Roseri6-2, 6-5
L#2 SinglesRoida Simbolon vs Roxana Aleksic3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDauwn Houston / Maura Starshak vs Ginger Riessen / Martha Davis3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAndrea Grahe vs Teodora Varcheva2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEla Lewis / Pauline Camacho vs Christine Meade / Maria Lobo-Corey0-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesMeghan Ahlgrim vs Monique Melnick6-2, 3-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKathryn Cattafesta / Shelley Turk vs Rebecca Daly / Julie Weidner2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesRoida Simbolon / Dauwn Houston vs Emily Doyle / Ana Chang2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Ahlgrim vs Mary Pat Barbarie6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Lourdes Bandelow / Shelley Turk vs Laura Purcell / Alja Hessami-Maas7-6, 3-1
W#2 SinglesReatha Kay vs Savanna Rhodes6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW4.0 g.Tam Corey Mon 7 $2261231228235
2CDTA S 18&OW4.0 h.Glenbrook Gray Tue 6:30 $2552241128269
3CDTA S 18&OW4.0 f.McFetridge Lund Fri 7:30 $2052211431250
4CDTA S 18&OW4.0 e.Heritage Chmieleski Thur 7 $2143181737285
5CDTA S 18&OW4.0 b.Centennial Nemec Thur 7 $2034201537294
6CDTA S 18&OW4.0 c.MT Bann Zepeda Wed 6:30 $2525161939271
7CDTA S 18&OW4.0 d.McFetridge Newson Sat 7 $2025132248318
8CDTA S 18&OW4.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 1 $281653062395

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Chandana Namburi
published 4.5
3.80
Stephanie Jund
published
Ela Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Claudia Moscoso-Cordero
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.68
Dauwn Houston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Meghan Ahlgrim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.63
Maura Starshak
published 4
3.63
Reatha Kay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.61
Ling Arenson
published 4
3.53
3.47
Andrea Grahe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.39
Kathryn Cattafesta
published 3.5
3.34
Pauline Camacho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Jean Sawin
published 3.5
3.21
Vina Maniquis
published 3.5
Kerry Gomez
published
Roida Simbolon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Shelley Turk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Sawin + Andrea Grahe5152% games+5.9% vs expected
Jean Sawin + Maria Lourdes Bandelow6158% games−8.9% vs expected
Kerry Gomez + Kathryn Cattafesta0538% games−12.0% vs expected
Maura Starshak + Ling Arenson3450% gamesnot enough data
Kerry Gomez + Jean Sawin4257% gamesnot enough data
Jean Sawin + Claudia Moscoso-Cordero4253% gamesnot enough data
Pauline Camacho + Vina Maniquis3255% gamesnot enough data
Pauline Camacho + Ling Arenson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chandana Namburi
64W–47L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
4.20
Stephanie Jund
14W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Ela Lewis
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Claudia Moscoso-Cordero
48W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Dauwn Houston
4W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Meghan Ahlgrim
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.65
4
Maura Starshak
88W–46L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
Reatha Kay
26W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Ling Arenson
54W–44L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Maria Lourdes Bandelow
93W–66L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.53
4
Andrea Grahe
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Kathryn Cattafesta
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Pauline Camacho
15W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Jean Sawin
91W–91L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Vina Maniquis
100W–105L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
Kerry Gomez
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roida Simbolon
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelley Turk
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.