Teams

CDTA S 18&OW4.0 c.MT Bann Zepeda Wed 6:30 $25

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

23 players · average NTRP 3.97 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesKristen Coy / Dani Zepeda vs Martha Davis / Christine Meade6-4, 5-3
L#1 DoublesMolly Shapiro / Tracy Miller vs Kitty Swanson / Terri Whiting5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRosa Hugener / Pam Fisher vs Linda Borst / Lori Raffone4-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesLisa Potash / Jennifer Giertsen vs Anne Feely / Joni Roseri4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeah Starkman / Lisa Potash vs Jendy Barnes / Ana Chang1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesMolly Shapiro / Rebecca Kosner vs Johanna Raimond / Kate Stankiewicz1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKristine Blaser vs Alexandra Gorodiski0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Giertsen / Lisa Potash vs Lilia Zaparaniuk / Nancy Manolis4-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesDani Zepeda / Kristen Coy vs Hoda Elshakankery / Gayle Dominicis6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OW4.0 g.Tam Corey Mon 7 $2261231228235
2CDTA S 18&OW4.0 h.Glenbrook Gray Tue 6:30 $2552241128269
3CDTA S 18&OW4.0 f.McFetridge Lund Fri 7:30 $2052211431250
4CDTA S 18&OW4.0 e.Heritage Chmieleski Thur 7 $2143181737285
5CDTA S 18&OW4.0 b.Centennial Nemec Thur 7 $2034201537294
6CDTA S 18&OW4.0 c.MT Bann Zepeda Wed 6:30 $2525161939271
7CDTA S 18&OW4.0 d.McFetridge Newson Sat 7 $2025132248318
8CDTA S 18&OW4.0 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 1 $281653062395

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Perry Mimms
published 4.5
4.02
Anna Dau
published 4
4.00
Kristen Coy
published 4
3.94
Ellen Phillips
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.89
Tracy Merrell
published 4
3.84
Rebecca Kosner
published 4
3.76
Molly Shapiro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Sheila Bondoc
published 4
Dani Zepeda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Sophia Koliatsis
published 4
3.63
Leah Starkman
published 4
3.63
Susan Kalina
published
3.61
Rochelle Meng
published 4
3.60
Pam Fisher
published 4
3.58
3.56
Lisa Potash
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Jennifer Margolis
published
3.46
Jennifer Giertsen
published 3.5
3.29
Rosemary Wheeler
published 3.5
3.23
Rosa Hugener
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Alexander
published
Julie Steinberg
published
Kristine Blaser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Coy + Anna Dau11164% games+8.0% vs expected
Heather Vishnubhakat + Rochelle Meng6460% games+7.3% vs expected
Pam Fisher + Sheila Bondoc4160% games+6.4% vs expected
Susan Kalina + Sophia Koliatsis4264% games+6.2% vs expected
Molly Shapiro + Jennifer Giertsen4157% games+6.1% vs expected
Sophia Koliatsis + Leah Starkman5358% games+5.7% vs expected
Heather Vishnubhakat + Anna Dau11360% games+4.1% vs expected
Dani Zepeda + Rebecca Kosner13653% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Perry Mimms
120W–59L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Anna Dau
206W–99L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Kristen Coy
127W–62L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Ellen Phillips
27W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Tracy Merrell
103W–83L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Rebecca Kosner
96W–53L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Molly Shapiro
58W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Sheila Bondoc
117W–62L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dani Zepeda
69W–56L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Sophia Koliatsis
341W–195L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Leah Starkman
228W–152L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.63
Susan Kalina
52W–41L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Rochelle Meng
184W–198L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Pam Fisher
88W–71L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Heather Vishnubhakat
130W–98L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Lisa Potash
67W–76L career · 3 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Margolis
31W–31L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Jennifer Giertsen
110W–84L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Rosemary Wheeler
162W–147L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Rosa Hugener
35W–67L career · 1 line in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Julie Alexander
45W–56L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Steinberg
87W–36L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristine Blaser
30W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.