Teams

Idaho/Lawson/40&Over/9.0X

2022 USTA MIXED 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesJody Mallane / Brian Rice vs Greg Ferney / Shelley Ware6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-08-02vs Luv U Long TimeWon 10
W#2 DoublesRachel Kincheloe / Brian Rice vs Michael Karlfeldt / Shelley Ware7-5, 6-3
2022-07-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesRachel Kincheloe / Brian Rice vs Rick Roby / Shelley Ware6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jemre Okoh
published 5
4.53
Peter Questad
published 5
4.47
Kathy Brashear
published 4.5
4.38
Chad Vaughn
published 4.5
4.28
Rachel Kincheloe
published 4.5
4.21
Mike Kirby
published 4.5
4.21
Jody Mallane
published 4.5
4.21
Bobette Wood
published 4.5
4.16
Brian Rice
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Kerri Porritt
published 4.5
3.84
Diana Gastanaga
published 4
3.77
Paula Lawson
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Rice + Rachel Kincheloe14267% games+10.3% vs expected
Peter Questad + Bobette Wood3255% games+9.2% vs expected
Diana Gastanaga + Mike Kirby151049% games−2.4% vs expected
Brian Rice + Jody Mallane4253% gamesnot enough data
Chad Vaughn + Paula Lawson3256% gamesnot enough data
Bobette Wood + Mike Kirby4157% gamesnot enough data
Peter Questad + Jody Mallane303 matchesnot enough data
Peter Questad + Rachel Kincheloe213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Jemre Okoh
68W–81L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Peter Questad
120W–45L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.53
4.5
Kathy Brashear
172W–68L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
4.47
4.5
Chad Vaughn
65W–29L career · type S · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
4.38
4.5
Rachel Kincheloe
211W–79L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Mike Kirby
241W–106L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Jody Mallane
183W–95L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Bobette Wood
280W–115L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Brian Rice
89W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Kerri Porritt
126W–66L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Diana Gastanaga
121W–79L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Paula Lawson
203W–118L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.